Mich. Comp. Laws » Michigan Compiled Laws / Chapter 28 / Act 372 of 1927
Michigan Compiled Laws

Mich. Comp. Laws § 28.423 (2026)

Repealed. 2000, Act 381, Eff. July 1, 2001.

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MI-LEGlegislature.mi.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

FIREARMS


Act 372 of 1927


28.423 Repealed. 2000, Act 381, Eff. July 1, 2001.

    Repealed. 2000, Act 381, Eff. July 1, 2001.

Compiler's Notes:

    The repealed section pertained to application fee.

PopularName Notes:

CCW

PopularName Notes:

Concealed Weapons

PopularName Notes:

CPL

PopularName Notes:

Right to Carry

PopularName Notes:

Shall Issue
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 12 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1945–2022 · leading case: Michigan Coalition for Responsible Gun Owners v. City of Ferndale, 662 N.W.2d 864 (Mich. Ct. App. 2003).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Michigan Coalition for Responsible Gun Owners v. City of Ferndale, 662 N.W.2d 864 (Mich. Ct. App. 2003). “, MCL 28.423, 28.426, 28.429d, and 28.432c.”
People v. Vaines, 17 N.W.2d 729 (Mich. 1945). “§28.423]), relating to the carrying of firearms or dangerous weapons with “intent to use the same unlawfully, ’ ’ provides in part: “Any person who, with intent to use the same unlawfully against the person of another, goes armed with a pistol or other firearm or dagger, dirk,…”
People v. Jacques, 572 N.W.2d 195 (Mich. 1998). “§ 28.423. Thus, the defendant's actions may have been criminal, just not by means of the statute under which he was charged.”
People v. Iacopelli, 186 N.W.2d 38 (Mich. Ct. App. 1971). “226 (Stat Ann 1962 Rev § 28.423). The jury returned a verdict of guilty on the first count and acquitted defendant on the second count.”
People v. Iverson, 191 N.W.2d 745 (Mich. Ct. App. 1971). “The presence of the hunting knife in the automobile was not a violation of law and one of the officers testified that he knew it was not illegal and that he did not consider its presence in the glove compartment to be “extremely unusual”.”
People v. Harper, 142 N.W.2d 496 (Mich. Ct. App. 1966). “226 (Stat Ann 1962 Rev § 28.423), and in the second count with carrying a dangerous weapon in a certain motor vehicle occupied by the defendant, contrary to CL 1948, §750.”
People v. Autry, 152 N.W.2d 55 (Mich. Ct. App. 1967). “226 [Stat Ann 1962 Rev § 28.423]) and carrying a concealed weapon without a license (CL 1948, § 750.”
People v. Crow, 164 N.W.2d 750 (Mich. Ct. App. 1968). “226a (Stat Ann 1962 Rev § 28.423[1]). We summarily resolve the issues raised by the following statements: (1) A waiver of counsel on arraignment obviates any necessity of advising defendant of the same right at the time of sentencing.”
People of Michigan v. Brian Michael Dehart (Mich. Ct. App. 2022). · cites it 2× “As originally enacted, what is now MCL 28.423 required law enforcement officials, “immediately upon the arrest of any person for a felony, to take his finger prints .”
People v. Crow, 13 Mich. App. 594 (Mich. Ct. App. 1968). “226a (Stat Ann 1962 Rev § 28.423 [1]). We summarily resolve the issues raised by.”
People v. Brown, 174 N.W.2d 291 (Mich. Ct. App. 1969). “226 (Stat Ann 1962 Rev § 28.423). His sole contention is that there was not sufficient evidence to convict him of the crime charged.”
People v. Jones, 187 N.W.2d 542 (Mich. Ct. App. 1971). “226 (Stat Ann 1962 Rev § 28.423). MCLA § 750.81 (Stat Ann 1962 Eev § 28.”
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 28.423(14) — 1 case
People of Michigan v. Brian Michael Dehart (Mich. Ct. App. 2022). “As originally enacted, what is now MCL 28.423 required law enforcement officials, “immediately upon the arrest of any person for a felony, to take his finger prints .”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.