PUBLIC BODY LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCY ACT
Act 378 of 2004
28.589 Jurisdiction of law enforcement agency.
Sec. 9.
(1) Except as provided in subsection (2), the jurisdiction of law enforcement officers appointed under section 3 is limited to property owned or leased by the public body, wherever situated in this state, and shall extend to any public right-of-way traversing or immediately contiguous to the property. The jurisdiction of those law enforcement officers may be extended by state law governing peace officers or through deputization by a county sheriff if authorized by the governing entity.
(2) Notwithstanding subsection (1), the jurisdiction of law enforcement officers who are granted powers and authority under section 3 and are employed by a school district shall include all territory within the boundaries of the school district and all property outside the boundaries of the school district that is owned, leased, or rented by or is otherwise under the legal control of the school district that employs the public safety officers.
(3) A public law enforcement agency established under section 3 and each local law enforcement agency with which it has overlapping jurisdiction shall enter into a memorandum of understanding that establishes reasonable communication and coordination efforts between those law enforcement agencies. If the public law enforcement agency is a qualifying school district under section 2(b)(ii), the memorandum of understanding shall also establish jurisdiction of the public law enforcement agency.
(4) This act does not limit the jurisdiction of state, county, or municipal peace officers.
History: 2004, Act 378, Imd. Eff. Oct. 12, 2004
Notes of Decisions
Cited in
43
cases, 1957–1971 · leading case:
People v. Gould, 166 N.W.2d 530 (Mich. Ct. App. 1969).
People v. Gould, 166 N.W.2d 530 (Mich. Ct. App. 1969).
· cites it 4× “357 (Stat Ann 1954 Rev § 28.589) provides as follows: "Any person who shall commit the offense of larceny by stealing from the person of another shall be *87 guilty of a felony, punishable by imprisonment in the state prison not more than 10 years.”
People v. Membres, 191 N.W.2d 66 (Mich. Ct. App. 1971).
· cites it 2× “357 (Stat Ann 1954 Rev § 28.589). [3] MCLA § 768.32 (Stat Ann 1954 Rev § 28.”
People v. Gould, 179 N.W.2d 617 (Mich. 1970).
· cites it 2× “357 (Stat Ann 1954 Rev § 28.589) provides as follows: "`Any person who shall commit the offense of larceny by stealing from the person of another shall be guilty of a felony, punishable by imprisonment in the state prison not more than 10 years.”
Browning v. Michigan Dep't of Corr., 188 N.W.2d 552 (Mich. 1971).
· cites it 2× “357 (Stat Ann 1954 Rev § 28.589). The crime is punishable by imprisonment for a maximum of ten years in the state prison.”
People v. Gadson, 83 N.W.2d 227 (Mich. 1957).
“357 (Stat Ann § 28.589), an essential element of the larceny charged in the instant case, and one which the people must prove beyond a reasonable doubt, is that it was accomplished by “stealing from the person of another.”
People v. Price, 179 N.W.2d 177 (Mich. Ct. App. 1970).
“Since habeas corpus was an improper method of review, it is hereby ordered under our powers of superintending control, GrCR 1963, 711.”
People v. Johnson, 181 N.W.2d 425 (Mich. Ct. App. 1970).
“357 (Stat Ann 1954 Rev § 28.589). Defendant was sentenced to serve a term of from nine to ten years in prison.”
People v. Norman, 166 N.W.2d 9 (Mich. Ct. App. 1968).
“357 (Slat Ann 1954 Rev § 28.589). 3 CL 1948, § 750.89 (Stat Ann 1962 Rev § 28.”
People v. Evans, 193 N.W.2d 387 (Mich. Ct. App. 1971).
“In this connection it is of some significance that the defendants’ lawyer did not object to the instructions given and the evidence was uncontroverted that two men had snatched the victim’s purse and the only disputed issue was whether the defendants were the thieves.”
People v. Clyne, 193 N.W.2d 399 (Mich. Ct. App. 1971).
“357 (Stat Aim 1954 Rev § 28.589). 2 MCLA § 771.4 (Stat Ann 1954 Eev § 28.”
People v. Reid, 183 N.W.2d 622 (Mich. Ct. App. 1970).
“357 (Stat Ann 1954 Rev § 28.589), and the six to ten year sentence imposed on him November 21, 1969.”
People v. Miller, 186 N.W.2d 25 (Mich. Ct. App. 1971).
“357 (Stat Ann 1954 Rev § 28.589). 2 MCLA § 750.530 (Stat Ann 1954 Rev § 28.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.