Michigan Compiled Laws

Mich. Comp. Laws § 28.613 (2026)

Inquiry as to compliance with licensing standards; response.

✓ current as of July 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MI-LEGlegislature.mi.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

MICHIGAN COMMISSION ON LAW ENFORCEMENT STANDARDS ACT

Act 203 of 1965

28.613 Inquiry as to compliance with licensing standards; response.

Sec. 13.

(1) An individual law enforcement officer or law enforcement organization to whom an inquiry is made concerning an individual law enforcement officer's or law enforcement organization's compliance with the licensing standards established in this act shall respond to the inquiry within 45 calendar days.

(2) An individual law enforcement officer or law enforcement organization responding to an inquiry concerning an individual law enforcement officer's or law enforcement organization's compliance with the licensing standards established in this act may charge the inquiring party a reasonable fee to recover the actual cost of producing information, documents, and other items requested.

History: 1965, Act 203, Eff. Jan. 1, 1966 ;-- Am. 1976, Act 422, Imd. Eff. Jan. 11, 1977 ;-- Am. 2016, Act 289, Eff. Jan. 2, 2017

Compiler's Notes:

For transfer of statutory authority, powers, duties, functions, and responsibilities of the Michigan justice training commission, the Michigan justice training fund, the commission on law enforcement standards, and the law enforcement officers training fund to the new Michigan commission on law enforcement standards by type III transfer, see E.R.O. No. 2001-2, compiled at MCL 28.621 of the Michigan compiled laws.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 3 cases, 1979–1983 · leading case: Citizens for Pre-Trial Just. v. Goldfarb, 278 N.W.2d 653 (Mich. Ct. App. 1979).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Citizens for Pre-Trial Just. v. Goldfarb, 278 N.W.2d 653 (Mich. Ct. App. 1979). · cites it 8× “Defendants' argument that they did not violate the statute is based on MCL 28.613(2); MSA 4.450(13)(2): "(2) On and after the effective date of this act, there shall be levied an assessment as additional cost in an amount equal to 10% of every fine, penalty and forfeiture…”

Citizens for Pretrial Just. v. Goldfarb, 327 N.W.2d 910 (Mich. 1982). · cites it 2× “MCL 28.613; MSA 4.450(13). The Court of Appeals declared subsection (2) to be unconstitutional in People v Barber, 14 Mich App 395 ; 165 NW2d 608 (1968).”

People v. Barber, 165 N.W.2d 608 (Mich. Ct. App. 1983). · cites it 2× “The defect of the statutory provision under scrutiny is betrayed by the language of the statute: “There shall be levied an assessment as additional cost in an amount equal to 10% of every fine, penalty, and forfeiture imposed and collected by the courts for criminal offenses * *…”

— Mich. Comp. Laws § 28.613(2) — 1 case

Citizens for Pre-Trial Just. v. Goldfarb, 278 N.W.2d 653 (Mich. Ct. App. 1979). “Defendants' argument that they did not violate the statute is based on MCL 28.613(2); MSA 4.450(13)(2): "(2) On and after the effective date of this act, there shall be levied an assessment as additional cost in an amount equal to 10% of every fine, penalty and forfeiture…”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.