Mich. Comp. Laws » Michigan Compiled Laws / Chapter 28 / Act 295 of 1994
Michigan Compiled Laws

Mich. Comp. Laws § 28.726 (2026)

Providing or forwarding copy of registration or notification.

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MI-LEGlegislature.mi.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

SEX OFFENDERS REGISTRATION ACT


Act 295 of 1994


28.726 Providing or forwarding copy of registration or notification.

Sec. 6.

    (1) The officer, court, or agency registering an individual or receiving or accepting a registration under section 4 or receiving notice under section 5(1) shall provide the individual with a copy of the registration or notification at the time of registration or notice.

    (2) The officer, court, or agency registering an individual or receiving or accepting a registration under section 4 or notified of an address change under section 5(1) shall forward the registration or notification to the department in a manner prescribed by the department immediately after registration or notification.

History: 1994, Act 295, Eff. Oct. 1, 1995 ;-- Am. 1996, Act 494, Eff. Apr. 1, 1997 ;-- Am. 2011, Act 18, Eff. July 1, 2011

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 11 cases (5 in the last 5 years), 2011–2025 · leading case: People v. Lee, 803 N.W.2d 165 (Mich. 2011).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
People v. Lee, 803 N.W.2d 165 (Mich. 2011). · cites it 2× “until it determines that the individual’s registration was forwarded to the department [of state police] as required under [MCL 28.726].” Finally, for crimes falling under the catchall provision, MCL 769.”
People of Michigan v. Anthony Taylor Nunez (Mich. Ct. App. 2022). · cites it 3× “] Section 6, MCL 28.726, provides: 2 At the time of Nunez’s sentencing, MCL 28.”
People of Michigan v. Anthony Taylor Nunez (Mich. Ct. App. 2022). · cites it 3× “] Section 6, MCL 28.726, provides: 2 At the time of Nunez’s sentencing, MCL 28.”
People of Michigan v. Dwayne Demetrious Williams (Mich. Ct. App. 2023). · cites it 2× “The probation agent or the family division of circuit court shall give the individual the registration form after the individual is convicted, explain the duty to register and accept the completed registration for processing under [MCL 28.726]. The court shall not impose…”
People of Michigan v. Michael Bart Mileski (Mich. Ct. App. 2016). “until it determines that the individual’s registration was forwarded to the department [of state police] as required under [MCL 28.726].” Finally, for crimes falling under the catchall provision, MCL 769.”
People of Michigan v. Matthew Galloway (Mich. Ct. App. 2017). “724(5) that it “shall not impose sentence . . . until it determines that the individual’s registration was forwarded to the department [of state police] as required under [MCL 28.”
People of Michigan v. Matthew Galloway (Mich. Ct. App. 2017). “724(5) that it “shall not impose sentence . . . until it determines that the individual’s registration was forwarded to the department [of state police] as required under [MCL 28.”
People of Michigan v. Crystal L Shelton-Randolph (Mich. Ct. App. 2017). “In People v Lee, 489 Mich 297, 298 ; 803 NW2d 165 (2011), the trial court did not wait until the defendant’s registration was forwarded to the state police department before imposing the defendant’s sentence, as required pursuant to MCL 28.726. And the trial court did not…”
People of Michigan v. Crystal L Shelton-Randolph (Mich. Ct. App. 2017). “In People v Lee, 489 Mich 297, 298 ; 803 NW2d 165 (2011), the trial court did not wait until the defendant’s registration was forwarded to the state police department before imposing the defendant’s sentence, as required pursuant to MCL 28.726. And the trial court did not…”
People of Michigan v. Micah Henry Rickerd (Mich. Ct. App. 2024). “MCL 28.726, provides: (1) The officer, court, or agency registering an individual or receiving or accepting a registration under section 4 or receiving notice under section 5(1) shall provide the individual with a copy of the registration or notification at the time of…”
People of Michigan v. Roy John Klinesmith (Mich. Ct. App. 2025). “This Court explained that in Lee, the Supreme Court addressed “the effect of identical failures” and concluded that the trial court could not fix the issue by amending the judgment of sentence 20 months after sentencing.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.