Michigan Compiled Laws

Mich. Comp. Laws § 287.1003 (2026)

Prohibited conduct; exception; rebuttable presumption in civil forfeiture proceeding; method of representation.

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MI-LEGlegislature.mi.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

WOLF-DOG CROSS ACT


Act 246 of 2000


287.1003 Prohibited conduct; exception; rebuttable presumption in civil forfeiture proceeding; method of representation.

Sec. 3.

    (1) A person shall not do any of the following:

    (a) Possess a wolf-dog cross except in compliance with this act.

    (b) Breed a wolf-dog cross.

    (c) Subject to subsection (2), transfer ownership or possession of or receive a transfer of ownership or possession of a wolf-dog cross, with or without remuneration.

    (d) Subject to subsection (2), transfer ownership or possession of a canid, with or without remuneration, if the person has represented to the transferee that the canid is a wolf-dog cross or offer or advertise to transfer ownership or possession of a canid, with or without remuneration, representing the canid to be a wolf-dog cross.

    (e) Subject to subsection (2), receive a transfer or offer to receive a transfer of ownership or possession of a canid, with or without remuneration, if the owner of the canid has represented to the person that the canid is a wolf-dog cross.

    (2) Subsection (1)(c), (d), and (e) do not apply to the temporary transfer of possession of a wolf-dog cross under section 4(1)(a) or any other transfer of possession or ownership of a wolf-dog cross expressly authorized or required by this act.

    (3) In a civil forfeiture proceeding under this act, there is a rebuttable presumption that a canid is a wolf-dog cross if the current owner represents or has represented that the canid is a wolf-dog cross or if a previous owner transferred ownership or possession of the canid to the current owner, with or without remuneration, representing it to be a wolf-dog cross.

    (4) For the purposes of this section, a representation may be by advertisement, registration paper, or any other method.

History: 2000, Act 246, Imd. Eff. June 29, 2000

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 2000–2000 · leading case: Michigan Wolfdog Ass'n, Inc. v. St. Clair Cnty., 122 F. Supp. 2d 794 (E.D. Mich. 2000).
Michigan Wolfdog Ass'n, Inc. v. St. Clair Cnty., 122 F. Supp. 2d 794 (E.D. Mich. 2000). · cites it 3× “§ 287.1003(1). The Act requires owners to construct elaborate facilities, with certain specifications, for housing wolf-dog crosses.”
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 287.1003(1) — 1 case
Michigan Wolfdog Ass'n, Inc. v. St. Clair Cnty., 122 F. Supp. 2d 794 (E.D. Mich. 2000). “§ 287.1003(1). The Act requires owners to construct elaborate facilities, with certain specifications, for housing wolf-dog crosses.”
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 287.1003(l)(d) — 1 case
Michigan Wolfdog Ass'n, Inc. v. St. Clair Cnty., 122 F. Supp. 2d 794 (E.D. Mich. 2000). “§ 287.1003(1). The Act requires owners to construct elaborate facilities, with certain specifications, for housing wolf-dog crosses.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.