Michigan Compiled Laws

Mich. Comp. Laws § 290.669 (2026)

Action to enforce compliance; injunction; jurisdiction.

✓ current as of July 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MI-LEGlegislature.mi.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

AGRICULTURAL COMMODITIES MARKETING ACT

Act 232 of 1965

290.669 Action to enforce compliance; injunction; jurisdiction.

Sec. 19.

The director may institute an action necessary to enforce compliance with this act, a rule promulgated under this act, or a marketing agreement or program adopted under this act and committed to his or her administration. In addition to any other remedy provided by law, the director may apply for relief by injunction to protect the public interest without being compelled to allege or prove that an adequate remedy at law does not exist. The application may be made to a court of competent jurisdiction.

History: 1965, Act 232, Eff. Mar. 31, 1966 ;-- Am. 1980, Act 196, Imd. Eff. July 8, 1980 ;-- Am. 2002, Act 601, Imd. Eff. Dec. 20, 2002

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 3 cases, 1986–2010 · leading case: Dep't of Agric. v. Appletree Mktg., LLC, 779 N.W.2d 237 (Mich. 2010).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Dep't of Agric. v. Appletree Mktg., LLC, 779 N.W.2d 237 (Mich. 2010). “2919a provides: (1) A person damaged as a result of either or both of the following may recover 3 times the amount of actual damages sustained, plus costs and reasonable attorney fees: (a) Another person’s stealing or embezzling property or converting property to the other…”

Dep't of Agric. v. Appletree Mktg., LLC, 761 N.W.2d 277 (Mich. Ct. App. 2008). · cites it 2× “MCL 290.669 provides: The director may institute an action necessary to enforce compliance with this act, a rule promulgated under this act, or a marketing agreement or program adopted under this act and committed to his or her administration.”

Old Orchard Brands, Inc v. Dep't of Agric., 393 N.W.2d 608 (Mich. Ct. App. 1986). “1 In an unrelated proceeding, pursuant to MCL 290.669; MSA 12.94(39), the director of the Department of Agriculture instituted actions against the above parties in the district court, seeking to collect the unpaid assessments plus interest, penalties, and costs.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.