Michigan Compiled Laws

Mich. Comp. Laws § 3.981 (2026)

Interstate corrections compact; authority to enter.

✓ current as of July 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MI-LEGlegislature.mi.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

INTERSTATE CORRECTIONS COMPACT

Act 92 of 1994

3.981 Interstate corrections compact; authority to enter.

Sec. 1.

The governor of this state may enter into a compact as described in this act on behalf of the state of Michigan with any of the states of the United States legally joining therein.

History: 1994, Act 92, Imd. Eff. Apr. 13, 1994

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 3 cases, 1947–1968 · leading case: Gower v. Dep't of Conservation, 27 N.W.2d 203 (Mich. 1947).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Gower v. Dep't of Conservation, 27 N.W.2d 203 (Mich. 1947). “Buhl in March, 1945, about making an application to the retirement board for benefits under that act (Act No.”

Marion v. Vaughn, 163 N.W.2d 239 (Mich. Ct. App. 1968). · cites it 2× “40 (Stat Ann 1961 Rev § 3.981[40]), reads much like the exemption clause in the act before us except that instead of speaking of "any other benefits" (see footnote 1) it uses the words "any other right.”

Jackson v. State Employees Ret. Sys., 99 N.W.2d 572 (Mich. 1959). · cites it 3× “” See OAG-1945-1946, No 4753, p 732; PA 1943, No 240, § 20, as last amended by PA 1945, No 177 (Stat Ann 1946 Cum Supp § 3.981 [20]). After considerable delay during which both the corrections commission and the civil service commission addressed communications to the retirement…”

— Mich. Comp. Laws § 3.981(20) — 1 case

Jackson v. State Employees Ret. Sys., 99 N.W.2d 572 (Mich. 1959). “” See OAG-1945-1946, No 4753, p 732; PA 1943, No 240, § 20, as last amended by PA 1945, No 177 (Stat Ann 1946 Cum Supp § 3.981 [20]). After considerable delay during which both the corrections commission and the civil service commission addressed communications to the retirement…”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.