Michigan Compiled Laws

Mich. Comp. Laws § 3.994 (2026)

Conditional effective date.

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MI-LEGlegislature.mi.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

INTERSTATE EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT ASSISTANCE COMPACT; EQUIPMENT


Act 247 of 2001


3.994 Conditional effective date.

Sec. 4.

    This act does not take effect unless Senate Bill No. 715 of the 91st Legislature is enacted into law.

History: 2001, Act 247, Imd. Eff. Jan. 8, 2002

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 1962–1962 · leading case: Ridenour v. Cnty. of Bay, 114 N.W.2d 172 (Mich. 1962).
Ridenour v. Cnty. of Bay, 114 N.W.2d 172 (Mich. 1962). · cites it 3× “483 [Stat Ann 1961 Rev § 3.994(3)]) reads as follows: “See. 3. If an action contesting the validity of any securities proposed to be issued or any aspect of such validity is brought against any public body, the publie body may file a cross bill against the plaintiff and against…”
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 3.994(3) — 1 case
Ridenour v. Cnty. of Bay, 114 N.W.2d 172 (Mich. 1962). “483 [Stat Ann 1961 Rev § 3.994(3)]) reads as follows: “See. 3. If an action contesting the validity of any securities proposed to be issued or any aspect of such validity is brought against any public body, the publie body may file a cross bill against the plaintiff and against…”
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 3.994(7) — 1 case
Ridenour v. Cnty. of Bay, 114 N.W.2d 172 (Mich. 1962). “483 [Stat Ann 1961 Rev § 3.994(3)]) reads as follows: “See. 3. If an action contesting the validity of any securities proposed to be issued or any aspect of such validity is brought against any public body, the publie body may file a cross bill against the plaintiff and against…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.