Mich. Comp. Laws » Michigan Compiled Laws / Chapter 324 / Act 451 of 1994
Michigan Compiled Laws

Mich. Comp. Laws § 324.11521 (2026)

Repealed. 2022, Act 245, Eff. Mar. 29, 2023.

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MI-LEGlegislature.mi.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

NATURAL RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION ACT


Act 451 of 1994


324.11521 Repealed. 2022, Act 245, Eff. Mar. 29, 2023.

    Repealed. 2022, Act 245, Eff. Mar. 29, 2023.

Compiler's Notes:

    The repealed section pertained to the management of yard clippings.

PopularName Notes:

Act 451

PopularName Notes:

NREPA

PopularName Notes:

Solid Waste Act
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 2010–2016 · leading case: Systematic Recycling, LLC v. City of Detroit, 685 F. Supp. 2d 663 (E.D. Mich. 2010).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Systematic Recycling, LLC v. City of Detroit, 685 F. Supp. 2d 663 (E.D. Mich. 2010). · cites it 2× “The statute regulating composting facilities was enacted in January 2008, see Mich. Comp. Laws § 324.11521 (eff. Mar. 26, 2008), based on the concern that “existing law does not *668 give State agencies sufficient authority to take actions against rogue composters in a timely…”
Charter Twp. of White Lake v. Ciurlik Enter. (Mich. Ct. App. 2016). · cites it 2× “4 acre section of defendant’s facility had about 13,000 cubic yards of compost material; thus, MCL 324.11521(4)(c)(ii) was violated because it prohibited 1 We refer to Ciurlik Enterprises and Martin Ciurlik collectively as “defendant.”
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 324.11521(4)(c)(ii) — 1 case
Charter Twp. of White Lake v. Ciurlik Enter. (Mich. Ct. App. 2016). “4 acre section of defendant’s facility had about 13,000 cubic yards of compost material; thus, MCL 324.11521(4)(c)(ii) was violated because it prohibited 1 We refer to Ciurlik Enterprises and Martin Ciurlik collectively as “defendant.”
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 324.11521(4)(d)(ii) — 1 case
Charter Twp. of White Lake v. Ciurlik Enter. (Mich. Ct. App. 2016). “4 acre section of defendant’s facility had about 13,000 cubic yards of compost material; thus, MCL 324.11521(4)(c)(ii) was violated because it prohibited 1 We refer to Ciurlik Enterprises and Martin Ciurlik collectively as “defendant.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.