Michigan Compiled Laws

Mich. Comp. Laws § 324.20116 (2026)

Transfer of interest in real property; notice; certification of completed response activity.

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MI-LEGlegislature.mi.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

NATURAL RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION ACT


Act 451 of 1994


324.20116 Transfer of interest in real property; notice; certification of completed response activity.

Sec. 20116.

    (1) A person who has knowledge or information or is on notice through a recorded instrument that a portion or the entirety of a parcel of that person's property is a facility shall not transfer an interest in that real property unless he or she provides written notice to the purchaser or other person to which the property is transferred disclosing the known general nature and extent of the hazardous substance release and any land or resource use restrictions that are known by the person to apply. A restrictive covenant or notice that contains the required information that is recorded in the deed records for the property satisfies this requirement.

    (2) The owner of real property for which a notice required in subsection (1) has been recorded may, upon completion of a response activity under this part for the facility, record with the register of deeds for the appropriate county a certification that the response activity has been completed.

History: 1994, Act 451, Eff. Mar. 30, 1995 ;-- Am. 1995, Act 71, Imd. Eff. June 5, 1995 ;-- Am. 2014, Act 542, Imd. Eff. Jan. 15, 2015

PopularName Notes:

Act 451

PopularName Notes:

Environmental Remediation

PopularName Notes:

Environmental Response Act

PopularName Notes:

NREPA
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 2010–2021 · leading case: 1031 Lapeer LLC v. Rice, 810 N.W.2d 293 (Mich. Ct. App. 2010).
1031 Lapeer LLC v. Rice, 810 N.W.2d 293 (Mich. Ct. App. 2010). · cites it 10× “The trial court granted plaintiffs’ motion for partial summary disposition and denied defendant’s motion for partial summary disposition, ruling: *228 The first portion of Plaintiffs’ Motion for Summary Disposition based on MCL 324.20116(1) on the grounds that subject lease for…”
Amy Plets v. Triple L Land Dev. LLC (Mich. Ct. App. 2021). “” MCL 324.20116(1). -2- and moved for summary disposition on the fraudulent inducement claim under MCR 2.”
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 324.20116(1) — 2 cases
1031 Lapeer LLC v. Rice, 810 N.W.2d 293 (Mich. Ct. App. 2010). “The trial court granted plaintiffs’ motion for partial summary disposition and denied defendant’s motion for partial summary disposition, ruling: *228 The first portion of Plaintiffs’ Motion for Summary Disposition based on MCL 324.20116(1) on the grounds that subject lease for…”
Amy Plets v. Triple L Land Dev. LLC (Mich. Ct. App. 2021). “” MCL 324.20116(1). -2- and moved for summary disposition on the fraudulent inducement claim under MCR 2.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.