Michigan Compiled Laws

Mich. Comp. Laws § 324.20131 (2026)

Limitations on liability; circumstances requiring total costs and damages.

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MI-LEGlegislature.mi.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

NATURAL RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION ACT


Act 451 of 1994


324.20131 Limitations on liability; circumstances requiring total costs and damages.

Sec. 20131.

    (1) Except as provided in subsection (2), the liability under this part for each release or threat of release shall not exceed the total of all the costs of response activities, fines, and exemplary damages, plus $50,000,000.00 damages for injury to, destruction of, or loss of natural resources resulting from the release or threat of release, including the reasonable costs of assessing the injury, destruction, or loss resulting from the release or threat of release.

    (2) Notwithstanding the limitations in subsection (1), the liability of a person under this part shall be the full and total costs and damages listed in subsection (1), in either of the following circumstances:

    (a) The release or threatened release of a hazardous substance was the result of willful misconduct or gross negligence of the party.

    (b) The primary cause of the release or threat of release was a knowing violation of applicable safety, construction, or operating standards or regulations.

History: 1994, Act 451, Eff. Mar. 30, 1995

PopularName Notes:

Act 451

PopularName Notes:

Environmental Remediation

PopularName Notes:

Environmental Response Act

PopularName Notes:

NREPA
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 2003–2003 · leading case: Howell Twp. v. Rooto Corp., 670 N.W.2d 713 (Mich. Ct. App. 2003).
Howell Twp. v. Rooto Corp., 670 N.W.2d 713 (Mich. Ct. App. 2003). “20129; MCL 324.20131; MCL 324.20137. Thus, “[t]he breadth and detail of this statutory scheme provides an indication that the Legislature has preempted” the field of regulation relating to the recovery of costs incurred in responding to an incident involving the release of…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.