NATURAL RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION ACT
Act 451 of 1994
324.32501 Additional definitions.
Sec. 32501.
As used in this part:
(a) "Department" means the department of environmental quality.
(b) "Director" means the director of the department.
(c) "Marina purposes" means an operation making use of submerged bottomlands or filled-in bottomlands of the Great Lakes for the purpose of service to boat owners or operators, which operation may restrict or prevent the free public use of the affected bottomlands or filled-in lands.
History: Add. 1995, Act 59, Imd. Eff. May 24, 1995 ;-- Am. 2003, Act 14, Imd. Eff. June 5, 2003 ;-- Am. 2012, Act 247, Imd. Eff. July 2, 2012
Compiler's Notes:
For transfer of authority, powers, duties, functions, and responsibilities of the Land and Water Management Division, with the exception of the farmland and open space preservation program, natural rivers program, and Michigan information resource inventory system, to the Director of the Michigan Department of Environmental Quality, see E.R.O. No. 1995-16, compiled at MCL 324.99901 of the Michigan Compiled Laws.
PopularName Notes:
Act 451
PopularName Notes:
NREPA
Notes of Decisions
Cited in
4
cases, 2004–2011 · leading case:
Glass v. Goeckel, 703 N.W.2d 58 (Mich. 2005).
Glass v. Goeckel, 703 N.W.2d 58 (Mich. 2005).
· cites it 6× “Plaintiff argues that the public trust doctrine, which is a legal principle as old as the common law itself, and the Great Lakes Submerged Lands *62 Act (GLSLA), MCL 324.32501 et seq., [3] protect her right to walk along the shore of Lake Huron unimpeded by the private title of…”
Burleson v. Dep't of Env't Quality, 808 N.W.2d 792 (Mich. Ct. App. 2011).
· cites it 4× “Respondent refused to issue the permit, insisting that petitioner was also required to obtain a permit under part 325 of NREPA, also known as the Great Lakes submerged *547 lands act (GLSLA), MCL 324.32501 et seq. Petitioner argues that MCL 324.”
Glass v. Goeckel, 683 N.W.2d 719 (Mich. Ct. App. 2004).
· cites it 2× “The Great [L]akes Submerged Land Act, MCL § 324.32501 et seq[.], does provide for a specific definition of the high water mark of Lake Huron and does seem to support the argument that the Plaintiffs [sic] have the right to use the shore of Lake Huron lying below and lakewards of…”
Glass v. Goeckel, 683 N.W.2d 719 (Mich. Ct. App. 2004).
· cites it 2× “The Great [L]akes Submerged Land Act, MCL § 324.32501 et seq [.], does provide for a specific definition of the high water mark of Lake Huron and does seem to support the argument that the Plaintiff's [sic] have the right to use the shore of Lake Huron lying below and lakewards…”
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 324.32501(b) — 1 case
Burleson v. Dep't of Env't Quality, 808 N.W.2d 792 (Mich. Ct. App. 2011).
“Respondent refused to issue the permit, insisting that petitioner was also required to obtain a permit under part 325 of NREPA, also known as the Great Lakes submerged *547 lands act (GLSLA), MCL 324.32501 et seq. Petitioner argues that MCL 324.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.