Michigan Compiled Laws

Mich. Comp. Laws § 324.63705 (2026)

Environmental impact statement.

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MI-LEGlegislature.mi.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

NATURAL RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION ACT


Act 451 of 1994


324.63705 Environmental impact statement.

Sec. 63705.

    The environmental impact statement submitted to the department shall comply with the requirements of the department and shall include, but is not limited to, the following:

    (a) The compatibility of the proposed sand dune mining activity with adjacent existing land uses or land use plans.

    (b) The impact of the proposed sand dune mining activity on flora, fauna, or wildlife habitats.

    (c) The economic impact of the proposed sand dune mining activity on the surrounding area.

    (d) The effects of the proposed sand dune mining activity on groundwater supply, level, quality, and flow on site and within 1,000 feet of the proposed sand dune mining activity.

    (e) The effects of the proposed sand dune mining activity on adjacent surface resources.

    (f) The effect of the proposed sand dune mining activity on air quality within 1,000 feet of the proposed sand dune mining activity.

    (g) Whether the proposed sand dune mining activity is located within any of the following:

    (i) 1,000 feet of a residence.

    (ii)  2,000 feet of a school.

    (iii)  500 feet of a commercial development.

    (h) Alternatives, if any, to the location of the proposed sand dune mining activity and the reasons for the choice of the location of the proposed sand dune mining activity over those alternatives.

    (i) A description of the environment as it exists prior to commencement of sand dune mining activity of area of the proposed sand dune mining activity. The environmental impact statement shall provide the greatest detail of the areas and the environmental elements that receive the major impacts from the proposed activity, but also shall include areas that may be impacted as an indirect result of the project.

    (j) An inventory of the physical environmental elements of the proposed site. The inventory shall be conducted at a time or at different times of the year that will provide the most complete information regarding the existing conditions of the area that will be impacted directly or indirectly by the proposed activity.

History: Add. 1995, Act 57, Imd. Eff. May 24, 1995

PopularName Notes:

Act 451

PopularName Notes:

NREPA
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 2002–2004 · leading case: Preserve the Dunes, Inc v. Dep't of Env't Quality, 684 N.W.2d 847 (Mich. 2004).
Preserve the Dunes, Inc v. Dep't of Env't Quality, 684 N.W.2d 847 (Mich. 2004). · cites it 2× “MCL 324.63705(h). It must include a reclamation plan for the area to be mined.”
Preserve the Dunes, Inc v. Dep't of Env't Quality, 655 N.W.2d 263 (Mich. Ct. App. 2002). “The deq argues, however, that the only standards in part 637 are found at MCL 324.63705, 324.63706, and 324.63707. These sections require an applicant to submit an EIS, a progressive cell-mining unit and reclamation plan, as well as a fifteen-year mining plan.”
Preserve the Dunes, Inc. v. Dep't of Env't Quality, 690 N.W.2d 487 (Mich. Ct. App. 2004). · cites it 4× “To obtain a sand dune mining permit, the applicant must complete an EIS pursuant to the re *268 quirements of MCL 324.63705. Many of the factors listed in the statute are comparable to the factors this Court outlined in Portage.”
Preserve the Dunes Inc v. Dept of Env't Quality (Mich. 2004). “MCL 324.63705(h). It must include a reclamation plan for the area to be mined.”
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 324.63705(h) — 2 cases
Preserve the Dunes, Inc v. Dep't of Env't Quality, 684 N.W.2d 847 (Mich. 2004). “MCL 324.63705(h). It must include a reclamation plan for the area to be mined.”
Preserve the Dunes Inc v. Dept of Env't Quality (Mich. 2004). “MCL 324.63705(h). It must include a reclamation plan for the area to be mined.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.