Michigan Compiled Laws
Mich. Comp. Laws § 324.63709 (2026)
Denial of sand dune mining permit.
✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
MI-LEGlegislature.mi.gov
JustiaChapter on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
NATURAL RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION ACT
Act 451 of 1994
324.63709 Denial of sand dune mining permit.
Sec. 63709.
The department shall deny a sand dune mining permit if, upon review of the environmental impact statement, it determines that the proposed sand dune mining activity is likely to pollute, impair, or destroy the air, water, or other natural resources or the public trust in those resources, as provided by part 17.
History: Add. 1995, Act 57, Imd. Eff. May 24, 1995
PopularName Notes:
Act 451PopularName Notes:
NREPANotes of Decisions
Cited in 4
cases, 2002–2004 · leading case: Preserve the Dunes, Inc v. Dep't of Env't Quality, 684 N.W.2d 847 (Mich. 2004).
Preserve the Dunes, Inc v. Dep't of Env't Quality, 684 N.W.2d 847 (Mich. 2004). “Review of DEQ’s MCL 324.63709 Determinations As already discussed, a challenge under MEPA may be filed in circuit court before or during the time that the 15 alleged MEPA violation occurs, without any requirement that a litigant exhaust administrative remedies.”
Preserve the Dunes, Inc v. Dep't of Env't Quality, 655 N.W.2d 263 (Mich. Ct. App. 2002). “63704 and the general “umbrella” standard for the issuance of a mining permit pursuant to MCL 324.63709, which provides: The department shall deny a sand dune mining permit if, upon review of the environmental impact statement, it determines that the proposed sand dune mining…”
Preserve the Dunes, Inc. v. Dep't of Env't Quality, 690 N.W.2d 487 (Mich. Ct. App. 2004). “Our Supreme Court opined in this case that MCL 324.63709 was the appropriate statute under which to consider plaintiffs claims under MEPA.”
Preserve the Dunes Inc v. Dept of Env't Quality (Mich. 2004). “Review of DEQ’s MCL 324.63709 Determinations As already discussed, a challenge under MEPA may be filed in circuit court before or during the time that the 15 alleged MEPA violation occurs, without any requirement that a litigant exhaust administrative remedies.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.