Mich. Comp. Laws » Michigan Compiled Laws / Chapter 330 / Act 258 of 1974
Michigan Compiled Laws

Mich. Comp. Laws § 330.1100 (2026)

Definitions.

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MI-LEGlegislature.mi.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

MENTAL HEALTH CODE


Act 258 of 1974


330.1100 Definitions.

Sec. 100.

    The definitions in sections 100a to 100d apply to this act unless the context requires otherwise. Other definitions applicable to specific chapters are found in those chapters.

History: 1974, Act 258, Eff. Aug. 6, 1975 ;-- Am. 1990, Act 124, Imd. Eff. June 26, 1990 ;-- Am. 1995, Act 290, Eff. Mar. 28, 1996

Compiler's Notes:

    For transfer of powers and duties of licensing, monitoring, and accreditation, with the exception of the clinical services team, from the department of community health to the director of the department of commerce, see E.R.O. No. 1996-1, compiled at MCL 330.3101 of the Michigan Compiled Laws.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 8 cases (3 in the last 5 years), 2004–2023 · leading case: People v. Portus (In Re Portus), 926 N.W.2d 33 (Mich. Ct. App. 2018).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
People v. Portus (In Re Portus), 926 N.W.2d 33 (Mich. Ct. App. 2018). “1100b(7) ; MCL 330.1100 (stating that the definitions in MCL 330.”
Allen v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins., 708 N.W.2d 131 (Mich. Ct. App. 2005). · cites it 2× “However, the Mental Health Code definition has nothing to do with this no-fault case, see MCL 330.1100, except to illustrate that the Legislature knows how to expand the definition of a "family member" when, for limited statutory purposes, that is considered an appropriate…”
In re Blackshear, 262 Mich. App. 101 (Mich. Ct. App. 2004). “In these consolidated cases, we granted intervenor leave to appeal to determine whether the trial court may judicially admit a juvenile, found to be incompetent to stand trial, to the care, treatment, and supervision of a community mental health authority pursuant to the Mental…”
Matter of Blackshear, 686 N.W.2d 280 (Mich. Ct. App. 2004). “In these consolidated cases, we granted intervenor leave to appeal to determine whether the trial court may judicially admit a juvenile, found to be incompetent to stand trial, to the care, treatment, and supervision of a community mental health authority pursuant to the Mental…”
in Re Charles Frederick Portus (Mich. Ct. App. 2018). “1100b(7); MCL 330.1100 (stating that the definitions in §§ 100a to 100d apply to the Mental Health Code unless otherwise required by the context).”
In Re Courtney Minors (Mich. Ct. App. 2023). “622(g), (k), (q), or (r), performed with or on the child by another person may be admitted into evidence through the testimony of a person who heard the child make the statement as provided in this subrule.”
DOE v. N. Lakes Cmty. Mental Health Auth. (E.D. Mich. 2021). “He relies on the definition of “recipient” in § 330.1100(c)— which includes persons treated by community mental health authorities, like Defendant NLCMHA—as well as three cases where Michigan courts found governmental immunity exceptions in similar statutes.”
Peterson v. Polavarapu (E.D. Mich. 2021). “1100(a)(22) ("'Department' means the department of health and human services.”
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 330.1100(a)(22) — 1 case
Peterson v. Polavarapu (E.D. Mich. 2021). “1100(a)(22) ("'Department' means the department of health and human services.”
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 330.1100(a)(26) — 1 case
In Re Courtney Minors (Mich. Ct. App. 2023). “622(g), (k), (q), or (r), performed with or on the child by another person may be admitted into evidence through the testimony of a person who heard the child make the statement as provided in this subrule.”
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 330.1100(c) — 1 case
DOE v. N. Lakes Cmty. Mental Health Auth. (E.D. Mich. 2021). “He relies on the definition of “recipient” in § 330.1100(c)— which includes persons treated by community mental health authorities, like Defendant NLCMHA—as well as three cases where Michigan courts found governmental immunity exceptions in similar statutes.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.