Michigan Compiled Laws

Mich. Comp. Laws § 330.1286 (2026)

Adoption of local law, ordinance, resolution, or rule.

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MI-LEGlegislature.mi.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

MENTAL HEALTH CODE


Act 258 of 1974


330.1286 Adoption of local law, ordinance, resolution, or rule.

Sec. 286.

    (1) A city, county, township, or village shall not adopt or enforce a local law, ordinance, resolution, rule, or portion of a local law, ordinance, resolution, or rule that has the force of law and that imposes a civil or criminal penalty for public intoxication or being incapacitated, except as provided in subsection (3) or (4).

    (2) A local unit of government shall not interpret or apply any law of general application to circumvent subsection (1).

    (3) This section and sections 276 to 285 do not affect a law, ordinance, resolution, or rule against drunken driving, driving under the influence of alcohol or other drugs, or other similar offense involving the operation of a vehicle, snowmobile, aircraft, vessel, machinery, or other equipment, or motorized conveyance, or regarding the sale, purchase, dispensing, possession, transportation, consumption, or use of alcoholic beverages or other drugs at stated times and places, or by a particular class of individuals.

    (4) This section and sections 276 to 285 do not prohibit a local unit of government from adopting an ordinance consistent with section 167 of the Michigan penal code, 1931 PA 328, MCL 750.167.

History: Add. 2012, Act 500, Imd. Eff. Dec. 28, 2012 ;-- Am. 2014, Act 200, Imd. Eff. June 24, 2014

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case (1 in the last 5 years), 2024–2024 · leading case: Ronda Rae Jones v. Steven Naert, 121 F.4th 558 (6th Cir. 2024).
Ronda Rae Jones v. Steven Naert, 121 F.4th 558 (6th Cir. 2024). “1978) (per curiam); Mich. Comp. Laws § 330.1286 (1), (4). This legislative change reflected the state’s “judgment that public intoxication is so substantially different from conduct generally covered by the criminal law that it should not be a criminal offense at all.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.