Michigan Compiled Laws
Mich. Comp. Laws § 330.1806 (2026)
Single or married individual; determining insurance coverage and ability to pay.
✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
MI-LEGlegislature.mi.gov
JustiaChapter on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
MENTAL HEALTH CODE
Act 258 of 1974
330.1806 Single or married individual; determining insurance coverage and ability to pay.
Sec. 806.
(1) If the individual is single, insurance coverage and ability to pay shall first be determined for the individual. If the individual is an unmarried minor and the individual's insurance coverage and ability to pay are less than the cost of the services, insurance coverage and ability to pay shall be determined for the parents.
(2) If the individual is married, insurance coverage and ability to pay shall be determined jointly for the individual and the spouse.
History: 1974, Act 258, Eff. Nov. 6, 1974 ;-- Am. 1995, Act 290, Eff. Mar. 28, 1996
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2
cases, 1986–1986 · leading case: In Re Nichols, 388 N.W.2d 682 (Mich. Ct. App. 1986).
In Re Nichols, 388 N.W.2d 682 (Mich. Ct. App. 1986). “See also MCL 330.1806(2); MSA 14.800(806)(2). As addressed in In re Raseman Estate, supra , and as we discussed above in Issue 1, the classification of obligors for services provided is supported by considerations of causation, *12 benefit and moral duty.”
Dep't of Mental Health v. Nichols, 150 Mich. App. 1 (Mich. Ct. App. 1986). “See also MCL 330.1806(2); MSA 14.800(806)(2). As addressed in In re Raseman Estate, supra, and as we discussed above in Issue 1, the classification of obligors for services provided is supported by considerations of causation, *12 benefit and moral duty.”
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 330.1806(2) — 2 cases
In Re Nichols, 388 N.W.2d 682 (Mich. Ct. App. 1986). “See also MCL 330.1806(2); MSA 14.800(806)(2). As addressed in In re Raseman Estate, supra , and as we discussed above in Issue 1, the classification of obligors for services provided is supported by considerations of causation, *12 benefit and moral duty.”
Dep't of Mental Health v. Nichols, 150 Mich. App. 1 (Mich. Ct. App. 1986). “See also MCL 330.1806(2); MSA 14.800(806)(2). As addressed in In re Raseman Estate, supra, and as we discussed above in Issue 1, the classification of obligors for services provided is supported by considerations of causation, *12 benefit and moral duty.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.