Michigan Compiled Laws

Mich. Comp. Laws § 330.2102 (2026)

Effective date and applicability of particular sections and chapters.

✓ current as of July 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MI-LEGlegislature.mi.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

MENTAL HEALTH CODE

Act 258 of 1974

330.2102 Effective date and applicability of particular sections and chapters.

Sec. 1102.

(1) This act shall take effect August 6, 1975, except that the provisions of chapters 4, 5, and 8 shall take effect November 6, 1974.

(2) The provisions of sections 1020 to 1042 shall apply to persons against whom criminal proceedings are commenced on or after the effective date of those sections. Proceedings to determine the competency of persons against whom criminal proceedings are commenced before the effective date of those sections shall continue to be governed by the law in effect at the time those proceedings are commenced.

(3) The provisions of section 1050 shall apply to persons who are found not guilty by reason of insanity on or after the effective date of that section.

History: 1974, Act 258, Eff. Aug. 6, 1975 ;-- Am. 1975, Act 179, Eff. Aug. 6, 1975

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 4 cases, 1977–1980 · leading case: People v. Spry, 254 N.W.2d 782 (Mich. Ct. App. 1977).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

People v. Spry, 254 N.W.2d 782 (Mich. Ct. App. 1977). “, effective August 6, 1975, MCLA 330.2102; MSA 14.800 (1102). Presently, see MCLA 330.”

People v. Thomas, 292 N.W.2d 523 (Mich. Ct. App. 1980). “800(1050) and MCL 330.2102; MSA 14.800(1102). 19 People v Samuelson, supra.”

People v. Hamm, 261 N.W.2d 288 (Mich. Ct. App. 1977). “See 1975 PA 179 , amending MCLA 330.2102; MSA 14.800(1102). See also People v Matheson, 70 Mich App 172, 175 ; 245 NW2d 551 (1976).”

People v. Samuelson, 254 N.W.2d 849 (Mich. Ct. App. 1977). “Sub-section (3) provides that the new statute applies to persons found not guilty by reason of insanity on or after the effective date of the statute.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.