Mich. Comp. Laws » Michigan Compiled Laws / Chapter 333 / Act 368 of 1978
Michigan Compiled Laws

Mich. Comp. Laws § 333.12604a (2026)

Repealed. 2009, Act 188, Eff. May 1, 2010.

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MI-LEGlegislature.mi.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

PUBLIC HEALTH CODE


Act 368 of 1978


333.12604a Repealed. 2009, Act 188, Eff. May 1, 2010.

    Repealed. 2009, Act 188, Eff. May 1, 2010.

Compiler's Notes:

    The repealed sections pertained to prohibitions against smoking in private practice of health facility and designation of smoking areas.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 2007–2009 · leading case: McNeil v. Charlevoix Cnty., 772 N.W.2d 18 (Mich. 2009).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
McNeil v. Charlevoix Cnty., 772 N.W.2d 18 (Mich. 2009). · cites it 4× “" MCL 333.12604a(2)(a). Patients who are permitted to smoke must, however, be in a separate room from nonsmoking patients.”
McNeil v. Charlevoix Cnty., 741 N.W.2d 27 (Mich. Ct. App. 2007). · cites it 2× “” MCL 333.12604a(2)(a). Patients who are permitted to smoke must, however, be in a separate room from nonsmoking patients.”
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 333.12604a(2)(a) — 2 cases
McNeil v. Charlevoix Cnty., 772 N.W.2d 18 (Mich. 2009). “" MCL 333.12604a(2)(a). Patients who are permitted to smoke must, however, be in a separate room from nonsmoking patients.”
McNeil v. Charlevoix Cnty., 741 N.W.2d 27 (Mich. Ct. App. 2007). “” MCL 333.12604a(2)(a). Patients who are permitted to smoke must, however, be in a separate room from nonsmoking patients.”
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 333.12604a(2)(b) — 2 cases
McNeil v. Charlevoix Cnty., 772 N.W.2d 18 (Mich. 2009). “" MCL 333.12604a(2)(a). Patients who are permitted to smoke must, however, be in a separate room from nonsmoking patients.”
McNeil v. Charlevoix Cnty., 741 N.W.2d 27 (Mich. Ct. App. 2007). “” MCL 333.12604a(2)(a). Patients who are permitted to smoke must, however, be in a separate room from nonsmoking patients.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.