Michigan Compiled Laws

Mich. Comp. Laws § 333.6233 (2026)

License required; licensing unit; exceptions.

✓ current as of July 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MI-LEGlegislature.mi.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

PUBLIC HEALTH CODE

Act 368 of 1978

333.6233 License required; licensing unit; exceptions.

Sec. 6233.

(1) A person not otherwise licensed to provide psychological, medical, or social services shall not establish, conduct, or maintain a substance use disorder services program unless it is licensed under this part.

(2) The department shall establish a licensing unit to administer the licensing functions of this part.

(3) This section does not apply to a private, nonprofit organization exempt under section 501(c)(3)of the internal revenue code, 26 USC 501, that has been in existence since before September 30, 1965 and whose major purpose is to provide residential services for the redirection and improvement of drug abusers and other character disordered individuals.

History: 1978, Act 368, Eff. Sept. 30, 1978 ;-- Am. 2012, Act 501, Eff. Jan. 1, 2013

Compiler's Notes:

For transfer of powers and duties of the Office of Substance Abuse Services as an autonomous entity within the Department of Public Health to the Department of Public Health, see E.R.O. No. 1991-3, as amended, compiled at MCL 333.26321 of the Michigan Compiled Laws.

PopularName Notes:

Act 368

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 1 case, 1990–1990 · leading case: Gingerich v. White Pigeon Cmty. Schs., 736 F. Supp. 147 (W.D. Mich. 1990).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Gingerich v. White Pigeon Cmty. Schs., 736 F. Supp. 147 (W.D. Mich. 1990). · cites it 2× “§ 333.6233(1)] M.S.A. § 14.15(6233)(1). Finally, plaintiffs submit that the funding for the program violates [M.”

— Mich. Comp. Laws § 333.6233(1) — 1 case

Gingerich v. White Pigeon Cmty. Schs., 736 F. Supp. 147 (W.D. Mich. 1990). “§ 333.6233(1)] M.S.A. § 14.15(6233)(1). Finally, plaintiffs submit that the funding for the program violates [M.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.