Mich. Comp. Laws » Michigan Compiled Laws / Chapter 333 / Act 368 of 1978
Michigan Compiled Laws

Mich. Comp. Laws § 333.6501 (2026)

Repealed. 2012, Act 500, Imd. Eff. Dec. 28, 2012.

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MI-LEGlegislature.mi.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

PUBLIC HEALTH CODE


Act 368 of 1978


333.6501 Repealed. 2012, Act 500, Imd. Eff. Dec. 28, 2012.

    Repealed. 2012, Act 500, Imd. Eff. Dec. 28, 2012.

PopularName Notes:

Act 368
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6 cases, 1987–2003 · leading case: Markis v. City of Grosse Pointe Park, 448 N.W.2d 352 (Mich. Ct. App. 1989).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Markis v. City of Grosse Pointe Park, 448 N.W.2d 352 (Mich. Ct. App. 1989). · cites it 3× “If they had decided to invoke MCL 333.6501; MSA 14.15(6501), they would have had to follow the statute and, therefore, be bound by the mandatory language found therein.”
Cartwright Ex Rel. Est. of Cartwright v. City of Marine, 336 F.3d 487 (6th Cir. 2003). · cites it 3× “She alleges that the police officers violated Terry Cartwright’s substantive due process rights under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 , and that the City is liable for failure to train and supervise its police officers.”
Rogers v. City of Port Huron, 833 F. Supp. 1212 (E.D. Mich. 1993). · cites it 5× “§ 333.6501, which specifies that an individual who appears to be incapacitated in a public place shall be taken *1223 into protective custody, but not arrested, by a law enforcement officer.”
Morse v. City of Mount Pleasant, 408 N.W.2d 541 (Mich. Ct. App. 1987). · cites it 6× “If they had decided to invoke MCL 333.6501; MSA 14.15(6501), they would have had to follow the statute and, therefore, be bound by the mandatory language found therein.”
Hilliard v. Walker's Party Store, Inc., 903 F. Supp. 1162 (E.D. Mich. 1995). · cites it 4× “§ 333.6501. Plaintiffs allege that this failure to act as prescribed by state statute amounted to gross negligence on the part of the officers and that such negligence was a proximate cause of plaintiff Thomas Lee’s injuries.”
Williams v. Thompson, 426 N.W.2d 417 (Mich. Ct. App. 1988). · cites it 4× “It could also find a violation of the statute under state law, MCL 333.6501(1); MSA 14.15(6501)(1), which states in part: An individual who appears to be incapacitated in a public place shall be taken into protective custody by a law enforcement officer and taken to an approved…”
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 333.6501(1) — 4 cases
Markis v. City of Grosse Pointe Park, 448 N.W.2d 352 (Mich. Ct. App. 1989). “If they had decided to invoke MCL 333.6501; MSA 14.15(6501), they would have had to follow the statute and, therefore, be bound by the mandatory language found therein.”
Morse v. City of Mount Pleasant, 408 N.W.2d 541 (Mich. Ct. App. 1987). “If they had decided to invoke MCL 333.6501; MSA 14.15(6501), they would have had to follow the statute and, therefore, be bound by the mandatory language found therein.”
Rogers v. City of Port Huron, 833 F. Supp. 1212 (E.D. Mich. 1993). “§ 333.6501, which specifies that an individual who appears to be incapacitated in a public place shall be taken *1223 into protective custody, but not arrested, by a law enforcement officer.”
Williams v. Thompson, 426 N.W.2d 417 (Mich. Ct. App. 1988). “It could also find a violation of the statute under state law, MCL 333.6501(1); MSA 14.15(6501)(1), which states in part: An individual who appears to be incapacitated in a public place shall be taken into protective custody by a law enforcement officer and taken to an approved…”
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 333.6501(2) — 1 case
Morse v. City of Mount Pleasant, 408 N.W.2d 541 (Mich. Ct. App. 1987). “If they had decided to invoke MCL 333.6501; MSA 14.15(6501), they would have had to follow the statute and, therefore, be bound by the mandatory language found therein.”
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 333.6501(3) — 1 case
Rogers v. City of Port Huron, 833 F. Supp. 1212 (E.D. Mich. 1993). “§ 333.6501, which specifies that an individual who appears to be incapacitated in a public place shall be taken *1223 into protective custody, but not arrested, by a law enforcement officer.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.