Michigan Compiled Laws

Mich. Comp. Laws § 339.732 (2026)

Confidentiality; disclosure of information.

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MI-LEGlegislature.mi.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

OCCUPATIONAL CODE


Act 299 of 1980


339.732 Confidentiality; disclosure of information.

Sec. 732.

    (1) Except by written permission of the client or the heir, successor, or personal representative of the client to whom the information pertains, a licensee, or a person employed by a licensee, shall not disclose or divulge and shall not be required to disclose or divulge information relative to and in connection with an examination or audit of, or report on, books, records, or accounts that the licensee or a person employed by the licensee was employed to make. Except as otherwise provided in this section, the information derived from or as the result of professional service rendered by a certified public accountant is confidential and privileged.

    (2) Subsection (1) does not prohibit any of the following:

    (a) A certified public accountant, whose professional competence has been challenged in a court of law or before an administrative agency, from disclosing information otherwise confidential and privileged as part of a defense in the court action or administrative hearing.

    (b) The disclosure of information required to be disclosed in the course of practice monitoring programs and ethical investigations conducted by a licensed certified public accountant. In such cases, the information disclosed to another licensed certified public accountant in the course of practice monitoring programs and ethical investigations is confidential and privileged to the same degree and in the same manner as provided for in subsection (1).

    (c) A licensee, or a person employed by a licensee, from disclosing information otherwise privileged and confidential to appropriate law enforcement or governmental agencies when the licensee, or person employed by the licensee, has knowledge that forms a reasonable basis to believe that a client has committed a violation of federal or state law or a local governmental ordinance.

    (3) Documents or records in the possession of the department pertaining to a review, an investigation, or disciplinary actions under this article are exempt from disclosure under the freedom of information act, 1976 PA 442, MCL 15.231 to 15.246, unless the records or documents are used for either or both of the following purposes:

    (a) As evidence in a contested case held by the department.

    (b) As a basis for formal action by the department and until the action is resolved by a final order issued by the board.

History: Add. 1997, Act 10, Imd. Eff. May 16, 1997 ;-- Am. 2005, Act 278, Imd. Eff. Dec. 19, 2005

PopularName Notes:

Act 299
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 2001–2024 · leading case: Wells v. THB Am., LLC (In re Clements Mfg. Liquidation Co.), 486 B.R. 400 (Bankr. E.D. Mich. 2012).
Wells v. THB Am., LLC (In re Clements Mfg. Liquidation Co.), 486 B.R. 400 (Bankr. E.D. Mich. 2012). · cites it 14× “Introduction This opinion concerns Michigan’s accountant-client privilege statute, Mich. Comp. Laws Ann. § 339.732 . The Plaintiff Chapter 7 Trustee seeks discovery of an accountant’s work papers relating to a Defendant’s 2008 tax returns, and correspondence between the…”
Riley v. Ameritech Corp., Inc., 147 F. Supp. 2d 762 (E.D. Mich. 2001). · cites it 3× “§ 339.732. As in Indiana and Florida, Michigan’s common law does not recognize an accountant-client privilege.”
Jilek v. Stockson, 796 N.W.2d 267 (Mich. Ct. App. 2010). “229; accountant-client communications, MCL 339.732; penitent-clergy communications, MCL 600.”
Alter Domus (US) LLC v. Winget (E.D. Mich. 2024). “Laws § 339.732 (1)). He concluded that the purpose of that privilege “‘is to protect from disclosure the substance of the information conveyed by the client to the accountant’” and not the other way around.”
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 339.732(1) — 1 case
Wells v. THB Am., LLC (In re Clements Mfg. Liquidation Co.), 486 B.R. 400 (Bankr. E.D. Mich. 2012). “Introduction This opinion concerns Michigan’s accountant-client privilege statute, Mich. Comp. Laws Ann. § 339.732 . The Plaintiff Chapter 7 Trustee seeks discovery of an accountant’s work papers relating to a Defendant’s 2008 tax returns, and correspondence between the…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.