Michigan Compiled Laws

Mich. Comp. Laws § 339.904 (2026)

Collection agency; license required for each place of business; exceptions to licensing requirement of subsection (1); qualifications of applicant.

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MI-LEGlegislature.mi.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

OCCUPATIONAL CODE


Act 299 of 1980


339.904 Collection agency; license required for each place of business; exceptions to licensing requirement of subsection (1); qualifications of applicant.

Sec. 904.

    (1) Except as otherwise provided in this article, a person shall not operate a collection agency or commence in the business of a collection agency without first applying for and obtaining a license under this article from the department for each place of business.

    (2) A person is not subject to the licensing requirement of subsection (1) if the person's collection activities in this state are limited to interstate communications. This subsection does not exempt a person from other requirements of law that regulate collection practices.

    (3) The department may require financial statements, references, or other information it considers necessary to determine the qualifications of the applicant, including but not limited to, the names, addresses, and references of each member of a partnership or of each officer, director, or shareholder holding 10% or more of the outstanding shares of the agency.

    (4) Each individual, partner of a partnership, or officer or director of a corporation that is an applicant shall be not less than 18 years of age, be of good moral character, and have the financial responsibility, reputation, and experience such as to command the confidence of the community and to warrant the belief that the business will be operated lawfully, honestly, and fairly.

History: 1980, Act 299, Imd. Eff. Oct. 21, 1980 ;-- Am. 1981, Act 83, Imd. Eff. July 1, 1981 ;-- Am. 1988, Act 463, Eff. Sept. 1, 1989 ;-- Am. 1994, Act 143, Eff. Mar. 30, 1995

PopularName Notes:

Act 299
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 2001–2014 · leading case: Badeen v. Par, Inc, 853 N.W.2d 303 (Mich. 2014).
Badeen v. Par, Inc, 853 N.W.2d 303 (Mich. 2014). · cites it 6× “He alleged that the forwarding companies were acting as collection agencies under Michigan law but were doing so without a license in violation of MCL 339.904(1). The lenders that hired the forwarding companies, in turn, were allegedly violating Michigan law by hiring unlicensed…”
Gradisher v. Check Enf't Unit, Inc., 133 F. Supp. 2d 988 (W.D. Mich. 2001). · cites it 2× “§§ 339.904 and 339.918 apply only to a “collection agency.”
Badeen v. PAR, Inc., 834 N.W.2d 85 (Mich. Ct. App. 2013). “MCL 339.904, under the Occupational Code, in turn, prohibits anyone from “operat[ing] a collection agency or commenc[ing] in the business of a collection agency without” being licensed.”
Asset Acceptance Corp. v. Robinson, 625 N.W.2d 804 (Mich. Ct. App. 2001). “1 The article provides that a person shall not operate a collection agency without first obtaining a license, MCL 339.904; MSA 18.425(904), and maintaining a separate trust account, MCL 339.”
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 339.904(1) — 2 cases
Badeen v. Par, Inc, 853 N.W.2d 303 (Mich. 2014). “He alleged that the forwarding companies were acting as collection agencies under Michigan law but were doing so without a license in violation of MCL 339.904(1). The lenders that hired the forwarding companies, in turn, were allegedly violating Michigan law by hiring unlicensed…”
Gradisher v. Check Enf't Unit, Inc., 133 F. Supp. 2d 988 (W.D. Mich. 2001). “§§ 339.904 and 339.918 apply only to a “collection agency.”
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 339.904(2) — 1 case
Badeen v. Par, Inc, 853 N.W.2d 303 (Mich. 2014). “He alleged that the forwarding companies were acting as collection agencies under Michigan law but were doing so without a license in violation of MCL 339.904(1). The lenders that hired the forwarding companies, in turn, were allegedly violating Michigan law by hiring unlicensed…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.