Michigan Compiled Laws

Mich. Comp. Laws § 37.1303 (2026)

Exemptions.

✓ current as of July 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MI-LEGlegislature.mi.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

PERSONS WITH DISABILITIES CIVIL RIGHTS ACT

Act 220 of 1976

37.1303 Exemptions.

Sec. 303.

This article shall not apply to a private club, or other establishment not in fact open to the public, except to the extent that the goods, services, facilities, privileges, advantages, or accommodations of the private club or establishment are made available to the customers or patrons of another establishment that is a place of public accommodation, or if it is licensed, chartered, or certified by the state or any of its political subdivisions.

History: 1976, Act 220, Eff. Mar. 31, 1977

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 3 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1999–2023 · leading case: Doe v. Michigan Dept. of Corr., 601 N.W.2d 696 (Mich. Ct. App. 1999).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Doe v. Michigan Dept. of Corr., 601 N.W.2d 696 (Mich. Ct. App. 1999). “[MCL 37.1303; MSA 3.550(303).] The question raised by plaintiffs regarding the applicability of the HCRA to prisons and inmates presents an issue of first impression in this state.”

Parker v. William Beaumont Hosp. d/b/a Beaumont Hosp., Royal Oak (E.D. Mich. 2023). · cites it 2× “1103; MCL § 37.1303(a). The PWDCRA prohibits discrimination on the basis of one’s disability and specifically permits “a civil action for appropriate injunctive relief or damages, or both.”

Steele v. Am. Honda Motor CO., Inc. (E.D. Mich. 2019). “1606, and against a business open to the public per MCL 37.1303. * * * 32. The Defendants operate a business or businesses and a “transportation facility of any kind” that offers goods, services, privileges, etc.”

— Mich. Comp. Laws § 37.1303(a) — 1 case

Parker v. William Beaumont Hosp. d/b/a Beaumont Hosp., Royal Oak (E.D. Mich. 2023). “1103; MCL § 37.1303(a). The PWDCRA prohibits discrimination on the basis of one’s disability and specifically permits “a civil action for appropriate injunctive relief or damages, or both.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.