Mich. Comp. Laws » Michigan Compiled Laws / Chapter 37 / Act 453 of 1976
Michigan Compiled Laws

Mich. Comp. Laws § 37.2804 (2026)

Repeal of MCL 423.301 to 423.311, 37.1 to 37.9, and 564.101 to 564.704.

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MI-LEGlegislature.mi.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

ELLIOTT-LARSEN CIVIL RIGHTS ACT


Act 453 of 1976


37.2804 Repeal of MCL 423.301 to 423.311, 37.1 to 37.9, and 564.101 to 564.704.

Sec. 804.

     Act No. 251 of the Public Acts of 1955, as amended, being sections 423.301 to 423.311 of the Compiled Laws of 1970, Act No. 45 of the Public Acts of the Second Extra Session of 1963, as amended, being sections 37.1 to 37.9 of the Compiled Laws of 1970, and Act No. 112 of the Public Acts of 1968, as amended, being sections 564.101 to 564.704 of the Compiled Laws of 1970, are repealed.

History: 1976, Act 453, Eff. Mar. 31, 1977

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7 cases (3 in the last 5 years), 1981–2021 · leading case: Matras v. Amoco Oil Co., 385 N.W.2d 586 (Mich. 1986).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Matras v. Amoco Oil Co., 385 N.W.2d 586 (Mich. 1986). · cites it 2× “[1] The FEPA was subsequently repealed and its substantive provisions reenacted in the Civil Rights Act, MCL 37.”
Slayton v. Michigan Host, Inc, 376 N.W.2d 664 (Mich. Ct. App. 1985). “See MCL 37.2804; MSA 3.548(804). In this case, plaintiff claims damages for violations under § 202 of the Elliott-Larsen Civil Rights Act, which replaced the repealed FEPA.”
Tucich v. Dearborn Indoor Racquet Club, 309 N.W.2d 615 (Mich. Ct. App. 1981). “See MCL 37.2804; MSA 3.548(804). A statute is not applied retroactively unless the Legislature clearly and unequivocally expresses that intent.”
Volk v. X-Rite, Inc., 599 F. Supp. 2d 1118 (S.D. Iowa 2009). “” Mich. Comp. Laws § 37.2804 . The MSRA states the court “shall award to the prevailing party reasonable attorney fees and court costs.”
Samantha Lichon v. Michael Morse (Mich. 2021). “As an initial matter, the agreement specifically includes “disagreements” regarding the violation of state employment laws.”
Samantha Lichon v. Michael Morse (Mich. 2021). “As an initial matter, the agreement specifically includes “disagreements” regarding the violation of state employment laws.”
Jordan Smits v. Michael Morse (Mich. 2021). “As an initial matter, the agreement specifically includes “disagreements” regarding the violation of state employment laws.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.