Michigan Compiled Laws

Mich. Comp. Laws § 38.1057 (2026)

Retirement allowances, benefits, and credits not subject to taxation; subject to taxation beginning January 1, 2012; subject to public employee retirement benefit protection act.

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MI-LEGlegislature.mi.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

MICHIGAN LEGISLATIVE RETIREMENT SYSTEM ACT


Act 261 of 1957


38.1057 Retirement allowances, benefits, and credits not subject to taxation; subject to taxation beginning January 1, 2012; subject to public employee retirement benefit protection act.

Sec. 57.

    (1) Except as otherwise provided in this section, all retirement allowances and other benefits payable under this act and all accumulated credits of members, deferred vested members, and retirants in this retirement system are not subject to taxation by this state or any political subdivisions of this state.

    (2) Beginning January 1, 2012, all retirement allowances and other benefits payable under this act and all accumulated credits of members, deferred vested members, and retirants in this retirement system are subject to taxation by this state upon distribution to a member, deferred vested member, or retirant.

    (3) All retirement allowances and other benefits payable under this act and all accumulated contributions of members, deferred vested members, and retirants in this retirement system are subject to the public employee retirement benefit protection act, 2002 PA 100, MCL 38.1681 to 38.1689.

History: 1957, Act 261, Eff. Sept. 27, 1957 ;-- Am. 1961, Act 167, Eff. Sept. 8, 1961 ;-- Am. 1981, Act 123, Imd. Eff. July 23, 1981 ;-- Am. 1985, Act 39, Imd. Eff. June 13, 1985 ;-- Am. 1995, Act 258, Imd. Eff. Jan. 5, 1996 ;-- Am. 2002, Act 97, Imd. Eff. Mar. 27, 2002 ;-- Am. 2011, Act 43, Imd. Eff. May 25, 2011

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 1968–2011 · leading case: In Re Request for Advisory Opinion Regarding Constitutionality of 2011 PA 38, 806 N.W.2d 683 (Mich. 2011).
In Re Request for Advisory Opinion Regarding Constitutionality of 2011 PA 38, 806 N.W.2d 683 (Mich. 2011). · cites it 6× “rn or $150,000 for a joint return are entitled to the entire personal exemption (which is now $3,700),10 while those taxpayers whose total household resources are between $75,000 and $100,000 for a single return or $150,000 and $200,000 for a joint return are entitled to a…”
In Re Benton, 237 B.R. 353 (Bankr. E.D. Mich. 1999). “§ 38.1057(1) (governing legislators). The WCERS contends that just as Michigan law protects the retirement benefits of state employees, counties should be permitted to include the same protections in their employees’ retirement plans.”
Marion v. Vaughn, 163 N.W.2d 239 (Mich. Ct. App. 1968). · cites it 2× “The Legislative Retirement System Act, CLS 1961, § 38.1057 (Stat Ann 1961 Rev § 2.169[57]) exempts and makes nonassignable retirement allowances and other benefits and "all accumulated credits of participants.”
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 38.1057(1) — 2 cases
In Re Request for Advisory Opinion Regarding Constitutionality of 2011 PA 38, 806 N.W.2d 683 (Mich. 2011). “rn or $150,000 for a joint return are entitled to the entire personal exemption (which is now $3,700),10 while those taxpayers whose total household resources are between $75,000 and $100,000 for a single return or $150,000 and $200,000 for a joint return are entitled to a…”
In Re Benton, 237 B.R. 353 (Bankr. E.D. Mich. 1999). “§ 38.1057(1) (governing legislators). The WCERS contends that just as Michigan law protects the retirement benefits of state employees, counties should be permitted to include the same protections in their employees’ retirement plans.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.