Mich. Comp. Laws » Michigan Compiled Laws / Chapter 38 / Act 300 of 1980
Michigan Compiled Laws

Mich. Comp. Laws § 38.1321 (2026)

Public school employees' retirement system; creation.

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MI-LEGlegislature.mi.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

THE PUBLIC SCHOOL EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT ACT OF 1979


Act 300 of 1980


38.1321 Public school employees' retirement system; creation.

Sec. 21.

    A Michigan public school employees' retirement system is created for the public school employees of this state.

History: 1980, Act 300, Imd. Eff. Oct. 31, 1980

PopularName Notes:

Act 300
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases (3 in the last 5 years), 2009–2024 · leading case: AFT Michigan v. State, 297 Mich. App. 597 (Mich. Ct. App. 2012).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
AFT Michigan v. State, 297 Mich. App. 597 (Mich. Ct. App. 2012). “, which governs the Michigan Public School Employees Retirement System (MPSERS), MCL 38.1321. MCL 38.1343e requires that public school districts and other reporting units 1 withhold three percent of each employee’s wages and remit the amount to the MPSERS as “employer…”
Bandeen v. Pub. Sch. Employees' Ret. Bd., 766 N.W.2d 10 (Mich. Ct. App. 2009). “One situation is where a public school employee leaves employment for reasons of maternity, paternity, or child rearing.”
Patricia Batista v. Off. of Ret. Servs. (Mich. Ct. App. 2021). “” MCL 38.1321. The retirement system is intended to “be a qualified pension plan created in trust under section 401 of the internal revenue code, 26 USC 401[.”
Patricia Batista v. Off. of Ret. Servs. (Mich. Ct. App. 2021). “” MCL 38.1321. The retirement system is intended to “be a qualified pension plan created in trust under section 401 of the internal revenue code, 26 USC 401[.”
Patricia Batista v. Off. of Ret. Servs. (Mich. 2024). “, a member shall receive a retirement allowance that equals the product of the member’s total years, and fraction of a year, of credited service multiplied by 1.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.