Mich. Comp. Laws » Michigan Compiled Laws / Chapter 38 / Act 240 of 1943
Michigan Compiled Laws

Mich. Comp. Laws § 38.1f (2026)

Definitions; M to O.

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MI-LEGlegislature.mi.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

STATE EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT ACT


Act 240 of 1943


38.1f Definitions; M to O.

Sec. 1f.

    (1)  "Member" means a state employee included in the membership of the retirement system, as provided for in section 13.

    (2) "Membership service" means all service rendered after July 1, 1943.

    (3) "New member" means a person who becomes a member of this retirement system on or after January 1, 1945.

    (4) "Original member" means a person who became a member of this retirement system before January 1, 1945, or as provided in section 18.

History: Add. 1995, Act 176, Imd. Eff. Oct. 17, 1995

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 2005–2010 · leading case: VanZandt v. State Employees' Ret. Sys., 701 N.W.2d 214 (Mich. Ct. App. 2005).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
VanZandt v. State Employees' Ret. Sys., 701 N.W.2d 214 (Mich. Ct. App. 2005). “24 does not define the term “medical advi-sor,” nor is a definition provided in MCL 38.1f. However, MCL 38.6 does provide that the retirement board “shall *587 employ such other .”
Nason v. State Employees' Ret. Sys., 801 N.W.2d 889 (Mich. Ct. App. 2010). “]” MCL 38.1f(l). We note that the parties stipulated at the hearing that petitioner’s application was filed within one year of his termination from state employment and that petitioner was a state employee for at least 10 years before his termination.”
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 38.1f(l) — 1 case
Nason v. State Employees' Ret. Sys., 801 N.W.2d 889 (Mich. Ct. App. 2010). “]” MCL 38.1f(l). We note that the parties stipulated at the hearing that petitioner’s application was filed within one year of his termination from state employment and that petitioner was a state employee for at least 10 years before his termination.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.