Mich. Comp. Laws » Michigan Compiled Laws / Chapter 38 / Act 4 of 1937 (Ex. Sess.)
Michigan Compiled Laws

Mich. Comp. Laws § 38.84 (2026)

Probationary period; portions of act inapplicable.

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MI-LEGlegislature.mi.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

TEACHERS' TENURE


Act 4 of 1937 (Ex. Sess.)


38.84 Probationary period; portions of act inapplicable.

Sec. 4.

    Articles 4, 5 and 6 shall not apply to any teacher deemed to be in a period of probation.

History: Add. 1963, Act 242, Eff. Sept. 6, 1963

PopularName Notes:

Teachers' Tenure Act
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 10 cases, 1969–2002 · leading case: Slater v. Ann Arbor Pub. Schs. Bd. of Educ..
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Slater v. Ann Arbor Pub. Schs. Bd. of Educ. (Mich. Ct. App. 2002). “1 Defendants also argued below that the trial court lacked subject-matter jurisdiction because the State Tenure Commission must first address the issue whether a probationary teacher has achieved tenure.”
Rockwell v. Crestwood Sch. Dist. Bd. of Educ. (Mich. 1975). “Article II, § 4 of the TTA, MCLA 38.84; MSA 15.1984 reads in its entirety as follows: "Articles 4, 5, and 6 shall not apply to any teacher deemed to be in a period of probation.”
Rumph v. Wayne Cmty. Sch. Dist. (Mich. Ct. App. 1971). · cites it 2× “Elk Rapids Schools (1970), 383 Mich 661 ; MCLA § 38.84 (Stat Ann 1968 Rev § 15.1984).”
Caddell v. Ecorse Bd. of Educ. (Mich. Ct. App. 1969). “) 3 See CL 1948, § 38.84 as added by PA 1963, No 242 (Stat Ann 1968 Rev § 15.”
Lipka v. Brown City Cmty. Schs. (Mich. Ct. App. 1975). “Finally, we cite MCLA 38.84; MSA 15.1984 which provides that the right to appeal as outlined in article VI (MCLA 38.”
Lipka v. Brown City Cmty. Schs. (Mich. 1977). · cites it 2× “” *710 Article II, § 4, MCLA 38.84; MSA 15.1984 provides: "Articles 4, 5 and 6 shall not apply to any teacher deemed to be in a period of probation.”
Weckerly v. Mona Shores Bd. of Educ. (Mich. Ct. App. 1970). · cites it 2× “MCLA §38.84 (Stat Ann 1968 Eev §15.1984), Munro, supra.”
Kerr v. Clarenceville Sch. Dist. of Oakland & Wayne Ctys. (E.D. Mich. 1972). “§ 38.84, that “Articles 4, 5 and 6 shall not apply to any teacher deemed to be in a period of probation”.”
Breuhan v. Plymouth-Canton Cmty. Schs. (Mich. Ct. App. 1984). · cites it 2× “Whether the unionizing of teachers and its accompanying collective-bargaining agreements and grievance procedures, which came after the tenure act, has obviated the necessity for statutory tenure is also a disputed issue. [2] Holton Public Schools v Farmer, 77 Mich App 765, 770…”
Thomas v. Kalamazoo Sch. Dist. (Mich. Ct. App. 1977). “Article IV, § 1 of the act 1 provides that "discharge or demotion of a teacher on continuing tenure may be made only for reasonable and just cause, and only after such charges, notice, hearing, and determination thereof, as are hereinafter provided”.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.