Mich. Comp. Laws § 380.1

Short title.

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MI-LEGlegislature.mi.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

THE REVISED SCHOOL CODE

Act 451 of 1976

380.1 Short title.

Sec. 1.

This act shall be known and may be cited as "the revised school code".

History: 1976, Act 451, Imd. Eff. Jan. 13, 1977 ;-- Am. 1995, Act 289, Eff. July 1, 1996

FormerLaw Notes:

The School Code of 1955, deriving from Act 269 of 1955 and formerly compiled as MCL 340.1 to 340.984, was repealed by Act 451 of 1976 and Act 454 of 1976. Certain sections of the School Code of 1955 had been previously repealed by the following acts: Act 45 of 1959; Act 112 of 1959; Act 271 of 1959; Act 190 of 1962; Act 92 of 1963; Act 59 of 1964; Act 270 of 1964; Act 28 of 1965; Act 31 of 1966; Act 317 of 1968; Act 320 of 1968; Act 19 of 1969; Act 170 of 1969; Act 7 of 1971; Act 198 of 1971; Act 2 of 1972; Act 254 of 1972; and Act 166 of 1975.

The School Code of 1927, deriving from Act 319 of 1927 and formerly compiled as MCL 341.1 to 386.12, was repealed by Act 269 of 1955.

PopularName Notes:

Act 451

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 93 cases (13 in the last 5 years), 1978–2026 · leading case: Lansing Schools Education Ass'n v. Lansing Board of Education

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Lansing Schools Education Ass'n v. Lansing Board of Education (2010) mich · cites it 4× “Further, we must decide whether plaintiffs have standing to pursue the rest of their claims because the Revised School Code, MCL 380.1 et seq., does not create an express cause of action or expressly confer standing on plaintiffs to enforce the act’s provisions.”

Council of Organizations & Others for Education About Parochiaid, Inc. v. Governor (1997) mich · cites it 6× “9, § 11 (the school funding through sales tax provision). The trial court held that there was inadequate evidence to substantiate the claim.”

Owendale-Gagetown School District v. State Board of Education (1982) mich · cites it 6× “This law was repealed by the School Code of 1976, MCL 380.1 et seq.; MSA 15.4001 et seq.; see MCL 380.”

Snyder v. Charlotte Public School District (1985) mich · cites it 4× “The majority finds it unnecessary to answer the major constitutional questions posed by the parties in this case because of its conclusion that § 1147 of the School Code of 1976, MCL 380.1 et seq.; MSA 15.4001 et seq., requires the defendant to allow plaintiff to select a band…”

Lm v. State of Michigan (2014) michctapp · cites it 3× “MCL 380.1 et seq. MCL 388.1081 et seq. It is true, as our dissenting colleague observes, that plaintiffs also requested declaratory relief.”

Durant v. State Board of Education (1986) mich · cites it 2× “Rather, I write separately to challenge the majority's explication, or lack of explication, of Const 1963, art 8, § 2, the pertinent provisions of the School Code of 1976, MCL 380.1 et seq.; MSA 15.4001 et seq., and the school aid formula, MCL 388.”

Breighner v. MICH. HIGH SCHOOL ATHLETIC ASS'N, INC. (2004) mich · cites it 2× “[1] In 1995, the Legislature adopted the Revised School Code, MCL 380.1 et seq., which repealed and amended several statutes.”

Southfield Educ. Ass'n v. Bd. of Educ. of the Southfield Pub. Sch. (2017) michctapp “1248 of the Revised School Code (RSC), MCL 380.1 et seq ., by failing or refusing to recall Smith, (2) that defendants violated MCL 380.”

Clonlara, Inc v. State Board of Education (1993) mich · cites it 2× “There is no requirement in the School Code, MCL 380.1 et seq.; MSA 15.4001 et seq. or in the nonpublic school act mandating interactive face-to-face teacher-student contact.”

State Board of Education v. Houghton Lake Community Schools (1988) mich · cites it 2× “5 i FACTS It is undisputed that Houghton Lake Community Schools is a fourth-class district organized under the Michigan School Code of 1976, MCL 380.1 et seq.; MSA 15.4001 et seq. Houghton Lake received "minimal” state financial assistance in the 1985-86 school year, totaling…”

Mich. Gun Owners, Inc. v. Ann Arbor Pub. Sch. (2018) mich “, which is the only statute that defendants cite in support of their authority to enact the school policies at issue, provides, in pertinent part: A general powers school district has all of the rights, powers, and duties expressly stated in this act; may exercise a power…”

Herman v. Berrien County (2008) mich “8 MCL 380.1 et seq. 9 This subsection, in pertinent part, states: The superintendent of public instruction has sole and exclusive jurisdiction over the review and approval of plans and specifications for the construction, reconstruction, or remodeling of school buildings used…”

Show all 93 citing cases →

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.