Mich. Comp. Laws » Michigan Compiled Laws / Chapter 380 / Act 451 of 1976
Michigan Compiled Laws

Mich. Comp. Laws § 380.373 (2026)

Repealed. 2016, Act 192, Imd. Eff. June 21, 2016.

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MI-LEGlegislature.mi.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

THE REVISED SCHOOL CODE


Act 451 of 1976


380.373 Repealed. 2016, Act 192, Imd. Eff. June 21, 2016.

    Repealed. 2016, Act 192, Imd. Eff. June 21, 2016.

Compiler's Notes:

    The repealed section pertained to suspension of powers and duties of elected school board. The repealed section also pertained to powers and duties of mayor and chief executive officer, termination of contracts, and implementation of school district improvement plan.

PopularName Notes:

Act 451
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 2000–2005 · leading case: Craig v. Detroit Pub. Schs. Chief Exec. Officer, 697 N.W.2d 529 (Mich. Ct. App. 2005).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Craig v. Detroit Pub. Schs. Chief Exec. Officer, 697 N.W.2d 529 (Mich. Ct. App. 2005). · cites it 7× “Under MCL 380.373, the CEO essentially stands in the shoes of the former school board.”
Lucero Ex Rel. Lucero v. Detroit Pub. Schs., 160 F. Supp. 2d 767 (E.D. Mich. 2001). “§ 380.373(4) provides that Dr. Kenneth Burnley is the decision maker and suable entity on behalf of the school district.”
Moore v. Sch. Reform Bd. of City of Detroit, 147 F. Supp. 2d 679 (E.D. Mich. 2000). · cites it 3× “§ 380.373(1), and disqualified the existing school board members from appointment to the new School Reform Board.”
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 380.373(1) — 1 case
Moore v. Sch. Reform Bd. of City of Detroit, 147 F. Supp. 2d 679 (E.D. Mich. 2000). “§ 380.373(1), and disqualified the existing school board members from appointment to the new School Reform Board.”
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 380.373(4) — 2 cases
Lucero Ex Rel. Lucero v. Detroit Pub. Schs., 160 F. Supp. 2d 767 (E.D. Mich. 2001). “§ 380.373(4) provides that Dr. Kenneth Burnley is the decision maker and suable entity on behalf of the school district.”
Craig v. Detroit Pub. Schs. Chief Exec. Officer, 697 N.W.2d 529 (Mich. Ct. App. 2005). “Under MCL 380.373, the CEO essentially stands in the shoes of the former school board.”
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 380.373(7) — 1 case
Moore v. Sch. Reform Bd. of City of Detroit, 147 F. Supp. 2d 679 (E.D. Mich. 2000). “§ 380.373(1), and disqualified the existing school board members from appointment to the new School Reform Board.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.