Michigan Compiled Laws

Mich. Comp. Laws § 380.483a (2026)

Functions of board; transfer of powers and duties.

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MI-LEGlegislature.mi.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

THE REVISED SCHOOL CODE


Act 451 of 1976


380.483a Functions of board; transfer of powers and duties.

Sec. 483a.

    (1) This section applies to a first class school district only if the question under section 410 is not approved in the first class school district.

    (2) The first class school district board shall perform the following functions:

    (a) Central purchasing.

    (b) Payroll.

    (c) Employment, discharge, assignment, and promotion of teachers and other employees of the district.

    (d) Contract negotiations for all employees, subject to 1947 PA 336, MCL 423.201 to 423.217, and subject to bargaining certification and the collective bargaining agreement pertaining to affected employees.

    (e) Property management and maintenance and the use of educational facilities.

    (f) Bonding.

    (g) Special education programs.

    (h) Allocation of funds for capital outlay and operations.

    (i) Determination of the curriculum and the establishment of educational and testing programs.

    (j) Adoption of a budget.

    (3) All powers and duties formerly vested in the regional boards are transferred to the first class school district board.

History: Add. 1981, Act 96, Eff. Jan. 1, 1983 ;-- Am. 2004, Act 303, Imd. Eff. Aug. 10, 2004

PopularName Notes:

Act 451
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 2002–2002 · leading case: Slater v. Ann Arbor Pub. Schs. Bd. of Educ..
Slater v. Ann Arbor Pub. Schs. Bd. of Educ. (Mich. Ct. App. 2002). “See MCL 380.483a(l)(d), 423.215; Detroit Police Officers Ass’n v Detroit, 391 Mich 44, 54-55 ; 214 NW2d 803 (1974).”
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 380.483a(l)(d) — 1 case
Slater v. Ann Arbor Pub. Schs. Bd. of Educ. (Mich. Ct. App. 2002). “See MCL 380.483a(l)(d), 423.215; Detroit Police Officers Ass’n v Detroit, 391 Mich 44, 54-55 ; 214 NW2d 803 (1974).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.