Mich. Comp. Laws » Michigan Compiled Laws / Chapter 390 / Act 48 of 1963 (2nd Ex. Sess.)
Michigan Compiled Laws

Mich. Comp. Laws § 390.553 (2026)

Boards of control; general supervision, powers and duties.

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MI-LEGlegislature.mi.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

CENTRAL, EASTERN, NORTHERN, AND WESTERN MICHIGAN UNIVERSITIES


Act 48 of 1963 (2nd Ex. Sess.)


390.553 Boards of control; general supervision, powers and duties.

Sec. 3.

    A board of control shall have general supervision of its institution, the control and direction of all funds of the institution, and such other powers and duties as may be prescribed by law.

History: 1963, 2nd Ex. Sess., Act 48, Eff. Jan. 1, 1964

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 1981–2006 · leading case: Herald Co. v. E. Michigan Univ. Bd. of Regents, 719 N.W.2d 19 (Mich. 2006).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Herald Co. v. E. Michigan Univ. Bd. of Regents, 719 N.W.2d 19 (Mich. 2006). · cites it 2× “1, 2002, regarding the new University House on campus: • Vice President for Business and Finance Patrick Doyle or other staff members of the Office of Business and Finance.”
Herald Co. v. E. Michigan Univ. Bd. of Regents, 693 N.W.2d 850 (Mich. Ct. App. 2005). · cites it 2× “NOTES [1] "A board of control shall have general supervision of its institution, the control and direction of all funds of the institution, and such other powers and duties as may be prescribed by law.”
Capital Region Airport Auth. v. DeWitt Charter Twp., 601 N.W.2d 141 (Mich. Ct. App. 1999). “This Court agreed, citing the university’s enabling legislation, MCL 390.553, 390.558; MSA 15.1120(3), 15.”
Marquette Cnty. v. Bd. of Control of N. Michigan Univ., 314 N.W.2d 678 (Mich. Ct. App. 1981). “1120(8), referring specifically to the regional universities, including defendant, provide respectively: "A board of control shall have general supervision of its institution, the control and direction of all funds of the institution, and such other powers and duties as may be…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.