Michigan Compiled Laws

Mich. Comp. Laws § 4.13 (2026)

Commission on legislative apportionment; appointment, terms, vacancies.

✓ current as of July 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MI-LEGlegislature.mi.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

COMMISSION ON LEGISLATIVE APPORTIONMENT

Act 46 of 1963 (2nd Ex. Sess.)

4.13 Commission on legislative apportionment; appointment, terms, vacancies.

Sec. 3.

The commission shall be appointed immediately upon the effective date of this act and also whenever apportionment or districting of the legislature is required by the provisions of the constitution. Members of the commission shall hold office until each apportionment and districting plan becomes effective. Vacancies shall be filled in the same manner as for original appointment.

History: 1963, 2nd Ex. Sess., Act 46, Eff. Jan. 1, 1964

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 9 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1967–2025 · leading case: Milford v. People's Cmty. Hosp. Auth., 155 N.W.2d 835 (Mich. 1968).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Milford v. People's Cmty. Hosp. Auth., 155 N.W.2d 835 (Mich. 1968). · cites it 8× “) "Section 4.13 REVOCATION OF MEMBERSHIP. Any physician may have his membership on the staff revoked after notice and hearing thereon by the executive committee of the hospital staff where he is a member for violation of any of these bylaws, unprofessional conduct, malpractice…”

Dumas v. Auto Club Ins. Ass'n, 473 N.W.2d 652 (Mich. 1991). · cites it 2× “See Perritt, Employee Dismissal Law & Practice (2d ed), § 4.13, pp 200-202. The signers of the lead opinion state in Rowe: [W]e do not suggest that a contract of employment is too indefinite to be enforced where the employee's consideration is the work performed in response to a…”

Vugterveen Sys., Inc. v. Olde Millpond Corp., 560 N.W.2d 43 (Mich. 1997). · cites it 2× “See McAlpine & Keating, supra, § 4.13, p 4-13. A subcontractor’s failure to provide a notice of furnishing within the twenty-day time frame does not serve to defeat its right to a lien.”

People v. Kimball, 311 N.W.2d 343 (Mich. Ct. App. 1981). · cites it 2× “Miller, Handbook of Criminal Law, § 29, p 100, Clark & Marshall, Law of Crimes (6th ed, Wingersky Rev), § 4.13, p 229. Under this view, once a defendant has gone so far as to have committed a punishable attempt, the crime is "complete" and he or she cannot then abandon the crime…”

Homac, Inc. v. DSA Fin. Corp., 661 F. Supp. 776 (E.D. Mich. 1987). · cites it 2× “Moreover, the difference here is that if Homac’s view is accepted, the language in Section 4.13 which established an exception to the right of first refusal (“other than .”

Schuster Constr. Servs., Inc. v. Painia Dev. Corp., 651 N.W.2d 749 (Mich. Ct. App. 2002). “See McAlpine & Keating, supra, § 4.13, p 4-13. A subcontractor’s failure to provide a notice of furnishing within the twenty-day time frame does not serve to defeat its right to a lien.”

United States v. NBD Bank N.A., 922 F. Supp. 1235 (E.D. Mich. 1996). “Under §§ 4.13 & 7.03 of the Guaranty Agreement between GNMA and Fidelity, T & I funds could only be withdrawn for payments of taxes and insurance on the mortgages being serviced.”

Milford v. People's Cmty. Hosp. Auth., 144 N.W.2d 687 (Mich. Ct. App. 1967). · cites it 2× “The question which immediately presents itself, is “what rule of medical policy did the plaintiff herein violate?” While section 4.13 *149 of the bylaws indicates certain standards, the adequacy of which is not at issue herein, yet section 9.”

Twp. of Imlay v. Sharon Schutte (Mich. Ct. App. 2025). · cites it 5× “Plaintiff alleged that defendant violated § 4.13 of the Imlay Township Ordinances by impermissibly operating a “commercial kennel” by virtue of housing, boarding, or caring for more than four dogs on the premises.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.