Michigan Compiled Laws

Mich. Comp. Laws § 400.109f (2026)

Medicaid-covered specialty services and supports; management and delivery; specialty prepaid health plans.

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MI-LEGlegislature.mi.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

THE SOCIAL WELFARE ACT


Act 280 of 1939


400.109f Medicaid-covered specialty services and supports; management and delivery; specialty prepaid health plans.

Sec. 109f.

    (1) The department shall support the use of Medicaid funds for specialty services and supports for eligible Medicaid beneficiaries with a serious mental illness, developmental disability, serious emotional disturbance, or substance use disorder. Medicaid-covered specialty services and supports shall be managed and delivered by specialty prepaid health plans chosen by the department. The specialty services and supports shall be carved out from the basic Medicaid health care benefits package.

    (2) Specialty prepaid health plans are Medicaid managed care organizations as described in section 1903(m)(1)(A) of title XIX, 42 USC 1396b, and are responsible for providing defined inpatient services, outpatient hospital services, physician services, other specified Medicaid state plan services, and additional services approved by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services under section 1915(b)(3) of title XIX, 42 USC 1396n.

    

History: Add. 2000, Act 410, Imd. Eff. Jan. 8, 2001 ;-- Am. 2005, Act 84, Imd. Eff. July 19, 2005 ;-- Am. 2017, Act 224, Eff. Mar. 20, 2018 ;-- Am. 2023, Act 99, Imd. Eff. July 19, 2023

PopularName Notes:

Act 280
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases (3 in the last 5 years), 2022–2023 · leading case: Kevin Wiesner v. Washtenaw Cnty. Cmty. Mental Health (Mich. Ct. App. 2022).
Kevin Wiesner v. Washtenaw Cnty. Cmty. Mental Health (Mich. Ct. App. 2022). “” Waskul v Washtenaw Co Community Mental Health, 979 F3d 426, 436 (CA 6, 2020), citing 42 USC 1396u-2(a)(1)(B); MCL 400.109f. The MDHHS “has supervisory and policymaking authority over the PIHPs and must ensure that PIHPs retain oversight and accountability over any…”
Kevin Wiesner v. Washtenaw Cnty. Cmty. Mental Health (Mich. Ct. App. 2022). “” Waskul v Washtenaw Co Community Mental Health, 979 F3d 426, 436 (CA 6, 2020), citing 42 USC 1396u-2(a)(1)(B); MCL 400.109f. The MDHHS “has supervisory and policymaking authority over the PIHPs and must ensure that PIHPs retain oversight and accountability over any…”
Muskegon Cnty. v. State of Michigan (Mich. Ct. App. 2023). “According to MCL 400.109f, the DHHS, acting through contractual arrangements, channels state and federal Medicaid funding to PIHPs for the provision, under managed-care plans, of certain types of mental-health services.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.