Michigan Compiled Laws

Mich. Comp. Laws § 400.18 (2026)

Appropriations for general public relief; distribution of moneys to county and district departments; assumption of program costs by state; exclusions; county expenditures and costs; reimbursement of county payments; difference between county's shared revenue and county's costs; supplemental security income and aid to dependent children; general public relief payments.

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MI-LEGlegislature.mi.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

THE SOCIAL WELFARE ACT


Act 280 of 1939


400.18 Appropriations for general public relief; distribution of moneys to county and district departments; assumption of program costs by state; exclusions; county expenditures and costs; reimbursement of county payments; difference between county's shared revenue and county's costs; supplemental security income and aid to dependent children; general public relief payments.

Sec. 18.

    (1) The state department shall provide for the distribution of such moneys as shall be appropriated by the legislature for public welfare grants in respect to general relief, but not expenditures in respect to a county medical care facility, other infirmary care in a county infirmary not existing on January 1, 1981, or inpatient hospitalization, to the several county and district departments of social services on the basis of monthly reporting to the department by the county departments.

    (2) Effective December 1, 1979 in counties having a fiscal year beginning December 1 and ending November 30 and effective January 1, 1980 in counties having a fiscal year beginning January 1 and ending December 31, all expenditures for a program of general public relief shall be appropriated from the general revenues of the state. The state shall assume the full cost of the general relief program for public welfare costs including total administration, but excluding costs incurred for county hospitalization and in the administration of and care in a county medical care facility, or infirmary not existing on January 1, 1981.

    (3) The period from December 1, 1974 through November 30, 1975 shall be the base year upon which the reductions of county expenditures shall be determined in those counties having a fiscal year beginning December 1 and ending November 30. The period from January 1, 1975 through December 31, 1975 shall be the base year upon which the reductions of county expenditures shall be determined in those counties having a fiscal year beginning January 1 and ending December 31. Net county costs shall be the county portion of matchable general relief expenditures which were matched by state funds during the base year, not to exceed 1 mill of the county's 1974 state equalized valuation, as certified by the director. During the first county fiscal year following the base year, county costs shall be 80% of the net county costs. During the second county fiscal year following the base year, county costs shall be 60% of the net county costs. During the third county fiscal year following the base year, county costs shall be 40% of the net county costs. During the fourth county fiscal year following the base year, county costs shall be 20% of the net county costs.

    (4) Beginning with the first county fiscal year following the base year, county payments to recipients of general public relief shall be reimbursed monthly by the state for all costs certified by the director, less the county costs.

    (5) The difference between a county's unrestricted state shared revenue distributed during the county's 1976 fiscal year pursuant to the provisions of Act No. 140 of the Public Acts of 1971, as amended, being sections 141.901 to 141.921 of the Michigan Compiled Laws, and the county's costs for general public relief in its 1976 fiscal year as certified by the department of management and budget shall be at least 30 cents per capita more than the difference between the county's unrestricted state shared revenue distributed during the county's 1975 fiscal year and the net county costs for general public relief as defined in subsection (3). Any additional amount required to fulfill the provisions of this subsection shall be paid from the general fund and remitted to the county with the June, 1977 payment provided under subsection (4).

    (6) The state department shall provide for the allocation and distribution of such moneys as shall be appropriated by the legislature or received from the federal government, for supplemental security income and aid to dependent children to be disbursed in accordance with the laws of this state.

    (7) The state department may make arrangements to disburse amounts to general public relief recipients after determination of the recipients' needs by county. The arrangements shall permit general public relief payments by the department and voucher or vendor payments for persons entitled to general public relief not involving any federal funds, where the well-being of the recipient or the protection of general public relief funds makes such payments desirable. Nothing in this section or act shall be construed, however, as limiting the right of the state department to make warrants payable to and deliver same to any creditor of a recipient of general public relief who has provided food, shelter, or public utility service to such recipients at the request of the state department.

History: 1939, Act 280, Imd. Eff. June 16, 1939 ;-- CL 1948, 400.18 ;-- Am. 1950, Ex. Sess., Act 19, Eff. Mar. 31, 1951 ;-- Am. 1951, Act 125, Eff. Sept. 28, 1951 ;-- Am. 1957, Act 286, Imd. Eff. June 13, 1957 ;-- Am. 1965, Act 401, Imd. Eff. Oct. 27, 1965 ;-- Am. 1975, Act 237, Eff. Dec. 1, 1975 ;-- Am. 1980, Act 486, Imd. Eff. Jan. 20, 1981

PopularName Notes:

Act 280
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6 cases, 1969–1999 · leading case: Faircloth v. Fam. Indep. Agency, 591 N.W.2d 314 (Mich. Ct. App. 1999).
Faircloth v. Fam. Indep. Agency, 591 N.W.2d 314 (Mich. Ct. App. 1999). · cites it 4× “§ 400.18; MSA 16.418. The Legislature thus eliminated GA in 1991 by not appropriating funds for the program in the DSS budget for fiscal year 1991-92.”
King v. Dir. of the Midland Cnty. Dep't of Soc. Servs., 251 N.W.2d 270 (Mich. Ct. App. 1977). · cites it 3× “MCLA 400.18; MSA 16.418, prior to its amendment by 1975 PA 237 , provided: "Whenever any county, district or city department share of general relief expenditures equals 1 mill of the state equalized valuation, the state shall distribute funds for 100% of the general relief costs…”
Pyke v. Dep't of Soc. Servs., 453 N.W.2d 274 (Mich. Ct. App. 1990). · cites it 4× “MCL 400.18; MSA 16.418. Allocation of general assistance benefits is made on the basis of need.”
Emmet Cnty. v. State Tax Comm'n, 244 N.W.2d 909 (Mich. 1976). · cites it 2× “" MCLA 400.18; MSA 16.418. Section 14 of the Revenue Sharing Act, MCLA 141.”
White v. Dep't of Soc. Servs., 174 N.W.2d 315 (Mich. Ct. App. 1969). · cites it 2× “MCLA § 400.18 subd. (b) [Stat Ann 1968 Rev § 16.”
Cnty. of Ingham v. Dep't of Soc. Servs., 233 N.W.2d 833 (Mich. Ct. App. 1975). · cites it 2× “MCLA 400.18; MSA 16.418, which restricts general relief capital expenditures to county medical care facilities, does not prohibit payment of depreciation costs under the Medicaid program.”
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 400.18(2)(3) — 1 case
King v. Dir. of the Midland Cnty. Dep't of Soc. Servs., 251 N.W.2d 270 (Mich. Ct. App. 1977). “MCLA 400.18; MSA 16.418, prior to its amendment by 1975 PA 237 , provided: "Whenever any county, district or city department share of general relief expenditures equals 1 mill of the state equalized valuation, the state shall distribute funds for 100% of the general relief costs…”
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 400.18(3) — 1 case
King v. Dir. of the Midland Cnty. Dep't of Soc. Servs., 251 N.W.2d 270 (Mich. Ct. App. 1977). “MCLA 400.18; MSA 16.418, prior to its amendment by 1975 PA 237 , provided: "Whenever any county, district or city department share of general relief expenditures equals 1 mill of the state equalized valuation, the state shall distribute funds for 100% of the general relief costs…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.