THE SOCIAL WELFARE ACT
Act 280 of 1939
400.1b Annual appropriation act as time-limited addendum; inclusion of program not as entitlement.
Sec. 1b.
(1) This act shall be read in conjunction with the annual appropriation act appropriating funds for the department for each fiscal year. The annual appropriation act shall be considered as a time-limited addendum to this act.
(2) A program created in or authorized under this act is subject to the annual appropriation of funds. The inclusion of a program in this act does not create an entitlement to that program, and any state department responsible for administering a program under this act is not required to operate that program unless the legislature appropriates funds for that program.
History: Add. 1969, Act 278, Imd. Eff. Aug. 11, 1969 ;-- Am. 1995, Act 223, Eff. Mar. 28, 1996 ;-- Am. 2010, Act 173, Imd. Eff. Sept. 30, 2010
PopularName Notes:
Act 280
Notes of Decisions
Faircloth v. Fam. Indep. Agency, 591 N.W.2d 314 (Mich. Ct. App. 1999).
· cites it 2× “§ 400.1b(1); MSA 16.401(2)(1), the annual appropriations acts involved in this case are considered "as a time-limited addendum to th[e] act.”
Pharm. Rsch. & Mfrs. of Am. v. Dep't of Cmty. Health, 657 N.W.2d 162 (Mich. Ct. App. 2003).
“See MCL 400.1b; 2001 PA 60 . Here, the Legislature, in its annual appropriations act, did include a directive to the dch to “submit changes to pharmacy policies for Medicaid recipients not enrolled in Medicaid hmos to the chairpersons.”
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 400.1b(1) — 1 case
Faircloth v. Fam. Indep. Agency, 591 N.W.2d 314 (Mich. Ct. App. 1999).
“§ 400.1b(1); MSA 16.401(2)(1), the annual appropriations acts involved in this case are considered "as a time-limited addendum to th[e] act.”
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 400.1b(l) — 1 case
Faircloth v. Fam. Indep. Agency, 591 N.W.2d 314 (Mich. Ct. App. 1999).
“§ 400.1b(1); MSA 16.401(2)(1), the annual appropriations acts involved in this case are considered "as a time-limited addendum to th[e] act.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.