Michigan Compiled Laws

Mich. Comp. Laws § 400.78 (2026)

Grants and gifts; acceptance by county board; use of funds; duty of prosecuting attorney.

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MI-LEGlegislature.mi.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

THE SOCIAL WELFARE ACT


Act 280 of 1939


400.78 Grants and gifts; acceptance by county board; use of funds; duty of prosecuting attorney.

Sec. 78.

    The county board may receive on behalf of the county any grant, devise, bequest, donation, gift or assignment of money, bonds or choses in action, or of any property, real or personal, and accept the same, so that the right and title to the same shall pass to the board. All such bonds, notes or choses in action, or the proceeds thereof when collected, and all other property or things of value so received by the board shall be used for the purposes set forth in the grant, devise, bequest, donation, gift, or assignment: Provided, That such purposes shall be within the powers conferred on said board. Whenever it shall be necessary to protect or assert the right or title of the board to any property so received or derived as aforesaid, or to collect or reduce into possession any bond, note, bill or chose in action, the prosecuting attorney is directed to take the necessary and proper proceedings and to bring suits in the name of the board on behalf of the county in any court of competent jurisdiction, state or federal, and to prosecute all such suits.

History: 1939, Act 280, Imd. Eff. June 16, 1939 ;-- CL 1948, 400.78

PopularName Notes:

Act 280
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 1972–1972 · leading case: Wayne Cnty. Prosecuting Attorney v. Wayne Cnty. Bd. of Commissioners, 205 N.W.2d 27 (Mich. Ct. App. 1972).
Wayne Cnty. Prosecuting Attorney v. Wayne Cnty. Bd. of Commissioners, 205 N.W.2d 27 (Mich. Ct. App. 1972). “MCLA 400.78; MSA 16.478: Board of social welfare Mandatory duty of prosecutor to protect rights of county board of social welfare in gifts and devises.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.