Michigan Compiled Laws
Mich. Comp. Laws § 418.111 (2026)
Persons subject to act.
✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
MI-LEGlegislature.mi.gov
JustiaChapter on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
WORKER'S DISABILITY COMPENSATION ACT OF 1969
Act 317 of 1969
418.111 Persons subject to act.
Sec. 111.
Every employer, public and private, and every employee, unless herein otherwise specifically provided, shall be subject to the provisions of this act and shall be bound thereby.
History: 1969, Act 317, Eff. Dec. 31, 1969
PopularName Notes:
Act 317Notes of Decisions
Cited in 20
cases (3 in the last 5 years), 1972–2022 · leading case: Boyd v. W G Wade Shows, 505 N.W.2d 544 (Mich. 1993).
Boyd v. W G Wade Shows, 505 N.W.2d 544 (Mich. 1993). “237(845) to determine whether it may take jurisdiction over the compensation claim.”
Brocail v. Detroit Tigers, Inc., 268 S.W.3d 90 (Tex. App. 2008). “See Mich. Comp. Laws Ann. § 418.111 (“Every employer, public and private, and every employee, unless herein otherwise specifically provided, shall be subject to the provisions of this act and shall be bound thereby.”
Sewell v. Clearing Mach. Corp., 347 N.W.2d 447 (Mich. 1984). “[12] MCL 418.111; MSA 17.237(111) and MCL 418.”
Adair v. State, 836 N.W.2d 742 (Mich. Ct. App. 2013). “See MCL 418.111 (“Every employer, public and private, and every employee, unless herein otherwise specifically provided, shall be subject to the provisions of this act and shall be bound thereby.”
Wallace v. Consol. Freightways, 500 N.W.2d 752 (Mich. Ct. App. 1993). “It asserts that the Michigan Legislature did not intend that nonresidents be eligible for disability benefits.”
Gallegos v. Glaser Crandell Co., 202 N.W.2d 786 (Mich. 1972). “Section 111 (MCLA 418.111; MSA 17.237[111]) has two classifications of employers public and private and a single classification of employees "every employee".”
UAW v. Green, 302 Mich. App. 246 (Mich. Ct. App. 2013). “(stating in MCL 418.111 that “[e]very employer, public and private, and every employee, unless herein otherwise specifically provided, shall be subject to the provisions of this act and shall be bound thereby”), and the Michigan Employment Security Act, MCL 421.”
Burger v. Midland Cogeneration Venture, 507 N.W.2d 827 (Mich. Ct. App. 1993). “Generally, workers’ compensation liability extends to all employers under § 111 of the act, MCL 418.111; MSA 17.237(111), other than those set forth in §115, MCL 418.”
Tulppo v. Ontonagon Cnty., 207 Mich. App. 277 (Mich. Ct. App. 1994). “” However, § 111 of the act, MCL 418.111; MSA 17.237(111), provides that "[e]very employer, public and private, and every employee” is subject to the provisions of the act unless otherwise specifically provided elsewhere in the act.”
Hawkins v. Auto-Owners Ins., 268 N.W.2d 534 (Mich. Ct. App. 1978). “NOTES [1] See MCL 418.111; MSA 17.237(111) and MCL 418.”
Walker v. Dep't of Soc. Servs., 410 N.W.2d 698 (Mich. 1987). “Typically, a private person who desires to follow *391 the Workers' Disability Compensation Act will purchase a workers' compensation insurance policy to protect against personal liability in the event an employee becomes injured on the job and is entitled to workers'…”
Smith v. Park Chem. Co., 397 N.W.2d 260 (Mich. Ct. App. 1986). “, extends to all employers under § 111, MCL 418.111; MSA 17.237(111), other than those enumerated in § 115.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.