Michigan Compiled Laws

Mich. Comp. Laws § 429.32 (2026)

Registration of certain marks prohibited.

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MI-LEGlegislature.mi.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

TRADEMARKS AND SERVICE MARKS


Act 242 of 1969


429.32 Registration of certain marks prohibited.

Sec. 2.

    A mark by which the goods or services of an applicant for registration may be distinguished from the goods or services of others shall not be registered if the mark:

    (a) Consists of or comprises immoral, deceptive, or scandalous matter.

    (b) Consists of or comprises matter which may disparage or falsely suggest a connection with persons, living or dead, institutions, beliefs, or national symbols, or bring them into contempt or disrepute.

    (c) Consists of or comprises the flag, coat of arms, or other insignia of the United States, or of a state or municipality, or of a foreign nation, or a simulation thereof.

    (d) Consists of or comprises the name, signature, or portrait of a living individual, except with the individual's written consent.

    (e) Consists of a mark which, when applied to the goods or services of the applicant, is merely descriptive or deceptively misdescriptive of the goods or services, or when applied to the goods or services of the applicant, is primarily geographically descriptive or deceptively misdescriptive of them, or is primarily merely a surname. This subsection shall not prevent the registration of a mark used in this state by the applicant which has become distinctive of the applicant's goods or services. The administrator may accept as evidence that the mark has become distinctive, as applied to the applicant's goods or services, proof of continuous use thereof as a mark by the applicant in this state or elsewhere for 5 years immediately preceding the date of the filing of the application for registration.

    (f) Consists of or comprises a mark which so resembles a mark registered in this state, or a mark or trade name previously used in this state by another person and not abandoned, as to be likely, when applied to the goods or services of the applicant, to cause confusion, mistake, or to deceive.

History: 1969, Act 242, Eff. Jan. 1, 1970 ;-- Am. 1980, Act 63, Imd. Eff. Apr. 2, 1980 ;-- Am. 1984, Act 203, Eff. Oct. 1, 1984

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 1980–2014 · leading case: Janet Travis, Inc. v. Preka Holdings, LLC, 856 N.W.2d 206 (Mich. Ct. App. 2014).
Janet Travis, Inc. v. Preka Holdings, LLC, 856 N.W.2d 206 (Mich. Ct. App. 2014). · cites it 4× “See also MCL 429.32(d) and (e). Descriptive marks differ from generic marks in one crucial respect, however: it is possible for descriptive marks to become source identifiers, and thus valid trademarks.”
Movie Mania Metro, Inc. v. GZ DVD's Inc., 857 N.W.2d 677 (Mich. Ct. App. 2014). “Travis, 306 Mich App at 281 , citing MCL 429.32(e). Eva’s Bridal Ltd v Halanick Enterprises, Inc, 639 F3d 788, 789 (CA 7, 2011) (Easterbrook, C.”
Empire Nat'l Bank of Traverse City v. Empire of Am. FSA, 559 F. Supp. 650 (W.D. Mich. 1983). “§ 429.32. Second, that plaintiff improperly represented in its trademark application that plaintiff has used “Empire” as a service mark since 1906.”
Buscemi's Inc v. Anthony Buscemi Delicatessen & Party Store, Inc, 294 N.W.2d 218 (Mich. Ct. App. 1980). “1 See MCL 429.32(d); MSA 18.638(22)(d). 2 Vandenburgh, Trademark Law and Procedure (2d ed), §§ 2.”
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 429.32(d) — 2 cases
Janet Travis, Inc. v. Preka Holdings, LLC, 856 N.W.2d 206 (Mich. Ct. App. 2014). “See also MCL 429.32(d) and (e). Descriptive marks differ from generic marks in one crucial respect, however: it is possible for descriptive marks to become source identifiers, and thus valid trademarks.”
Buscemi's Inc v. Anthony Buscemi Delicatessen & Party Store, Inc, 294 N.W.2d 218 (Mich. Ct. App. 1980). “1 See MCL 429.32(d); MSA 18.638(22)(d). 2 Vandenburgh, Trademark Law and Procedure (2d ed), §§ 2.”
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 429.32(e) — 2 cases
Janet Travis, Inc. v. Preka Holdings, LLC, 856 N.W.2d 206 (Mich. Ct. App. 2014). “See also MCL 429.32(d) and (e). Descriptive marks differ from generic marks in one crucial respect, however: it is possible for descriptive marks to become source identifiers, and thus valid trademarks.”
Movie Mania Metro, Inc. v. GZ DVD's Inc., 857 N.W.2d 677 (Mich. Ct. App. 2014). “Travis, 306 Mich App at 281 , citing MCL 429.32(e). Eva’s Bridal Ltd v Halanick Enterprises, Inc, 639 F3d 788, 789 (CA 7, 2011) (Easterbrook, C.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.