Michigan Compiled Laws

Mich. Comp. Laws § 436.1101 (2026)

Short title.

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MI-LEGlegislature.mi.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

MICHIGAN LIQUOR CONTROL CODE OF 1998


Act 58 of 1998


436.1101 Short title.

Sec. 101.

    This act shall be known and may be cited as the "Michigan liquor control code of 1998".

History: 1998, Act 58, Imd. Eff. Apr. 14, 1998

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 17 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 2000–2024 · leading case: Van Buren Charter Twp. v. Garter Belt, Inc, 673 N.W.2d 111 (Mich. Ct. App. 2003).
Van Buren Charter Twp. v. Garter Belt, Inc, 673 N.W.2d 111 (Mich. Ct. App. 2003). · cites it 2× “Defendant points to § 916 of the Michigan Liquor Control Code (mlcc), MCL 436.1101 et seq., which requires liquor licensees to obtain entertainment, dance, and topless activity permits.”
People v. Rutledge, 645 N.W.2d 333 (Mich. Ct. App. 2002). · cites it 2× “In her appellate brief, the prosecutor states that she "concurs with the basic information set forth in the Appellant's Statement of Facts.”
Michael Long v. Liquor Control Comm'n, 910 N.W.2d 674 (Mich. Ct. App. 2017). “Since 1990, he has held a specially designated distributor (SDD) license, *677 which allows him to sell alcohol 1 for off-premises consumption under the Michigan Liquor Control Code, MCL 436.1101 et seq. See MCL 436.1111(12) ; *64 MCL 436.”
People v. Al-Saiegh, 625 N.W.2d 419 (Mich. Ct. App. 2001). · cites it 2× “Mazurek, an enforcement supervisor for the Michigan Liquor Control Commission, testified that in 1998 the Legislature established the Michigan Liquor Control Code (hereinafter referred to as the MLCC), MCL 436.1101 et seq.; MSA 18.1175(101) et seq.”
L & L Wine & Liquor Corp. v. Liquor Control Comm'n, 733 N.W.2d 107 (Mich. Ct. App. 2007). “In this action involving the Michigan Liquor Control Code, MCL 436.1101 et seq., plaintiff appeals as of right a final order dismissing its claims for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction.”
Brang Inc v. Liquor Control Comm'n, 910 N.W.2d 309 (Mich. Ct. App. 2017). “Currently in place, statutorily speaking, is the Michigan Liquor Control Code (the Code), MCL 436.1101 et seq. Except as otherwise provided by the Code, the LCC "shall have the sole right, power, and duty to control the alcoholic beverage traffic and traffic in other alcoholic…”
Capital Area Dist. Library v. Michigan Open Carry, Inc., 826 N.W.2d 736 (Mich. Ct. App. 2012). “425o(l) prohibits a person who is licensed to carry a concealed pistol from carrying a concealed pistol on the premises of any of the following: a school or school property; a public or private childcare center, daycare center, child-caring institution, or child-placing agency;…”
People v. Antkoviak, 619 N.W.2d 18 (Mich. Ct. App. 2000). “The Legislature repealed the Liquor Control Act in 1998 and, in its stead, enacted the Liquor Control Code, MCL 436.1101 et seq.; MSA 18.1175(101) et seq.”
McGuire v. Sanders, 708 N.W.2d 469 (Mich. Ct. App. 2006). · cites it 2× “A retail licensee shall not directly or indirectly, individually or by a clerk, agent, or servant sell, furnish, or give alcoholic liquor to a person who is visibly intoxicated.”
Nessel v. Dineen Fam. Vineyards, L.L.C. (W.D. Mich. 2024). · cites it 6× “(“Defendant”), for permanent injunctive relief to restrain continuing violations of the Michigan Liquor Control Code, Mich. Comp. Laws §§ 436.1101 , et seq., and the Michigan Consumer Protection Act, Mich.”
In Re Investigative Subpoenas, 779 N.W.2d 277 (Mich. Ct. App. 2009). “3 The cases cited by Meijer and Dickinson consist of L & L Wine & Liquor Corp v Liquor Control Comm, 274 Mich App 354 ; 733 NW2d 107 (2007) (involving the power of the Liquor Control Commission under the Michigan Liquor Control Code, MCL 436.1101 et seq.); Huron Valley Schools v…”
Nessel v. Lady Hill LLC (E.D. Mich. 2023). · cites it 4× “§ 122a(a)(2) and includes “alcoholic liquor” as that term is defined in the Michigan Liquor Control Code, Mich. Comp. Laws §§ 436.1101 , et seq. 7.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.