Mich. Comp. Laws » Michigan Compiled Laws / Chapter 440 / Act 174 of 1962
Michigan Compiled Laws

Mich. Comp. Laws § 440.2101 (2026)

Uniform commercial code—sales; short title.

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MI-LEGlegislature.mi.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

UNIFORM COMMERCIAL CODE


Act 174 of 1962


440.2101 Uniform commercial code—sales; short title.

Sec. 2101.

    This article shall be known and may be cited as "uniform commercial code—sales".

History: 1962, Act 174, Eff. Jan. 1, 1964

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 34 cases (5 in the last 5 years), 1970–2026 · leading case: Neibarger v. Universal Coopertives, Inc., 486 N.W.2d 612 (Mich. 1992).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Neibarger v. Universal Coopertives, Inc., 486 N.W.2d 612 (Mich. 1992). · cites it 2× “[4] MCL 440.2101 et seq.; MSA 19.2101 et seq.”
Loretta Gayle Galea v. Fca US LLC, 917 N.W.2d 694 (Mich. Ct. App. 2018). “In January 2016, plaintiff filed a complaint alleging breach of express and implied warranties, revocation of acceptance under Michigan's Uniform Commercial Code (UCC), MCL 440.2101 et seq ., and violation of the Michigan Consumer Protection Act, MCL 445.”
Henderson v. Chrysler Corp., 477 N.W.2d 505 (Mich. Ct. App. 1991). · cites it 2× “Chrysler Corporation appeals by leave granted a Macomb Circuit Court order affirming judgment for plaintiff in this action for revocation of an automobile sale pursuant to Article 2 of the Uniform Commercial Code, MCL 440.2101 et seq.; MSA 19.2101 et seq.”
Grosse Pointe Law Firm, PC v. Jaguar Land Rover North Am., LLC, 894 N.W.2d 700 (Mich. Ct. App. 2016). “DISCUSSION Article 2 of the UCC, MCL 440.2101 through MCL 440.2725, governs the relationship between parties involved in contracts for the sale of goods.”
Citizens Ins. Co. of Am. v. Proctor & Schwartz, Inc., 802 F. Supp. 133 (W.D. Mich. 1992). · cites it 2× “§ 440.2101 et seq. The applicable period of limitation under the UCC is defined as follows: (1) An action for breach of any contract for sale must be commenced within 4 years after the cause of action has accrued.”
Ron Vanalstine v. Land O'Lakes Purina Feeds LLC, 929 N.W.2d 789 (Mich. Ct. App. 2018). “Michigan's version of Article 2 of the UCC, MCL 440.2101 et seq ., governs the transactions of the sale of goods.”
Wolverine World Wide, Inc. v. Wolverine Canada, Inc., 653 F. Supp. 2d 747 (W.D. Mich. 2009). · cites it 2× “Claims Under Michigan’s Uniform Commercial Code 5 Defendants argue the distribution agreement and the purchase orders are governed by Article 2 of the Michigan’s Uniform Commercial Code (UCC), MCL § 440.2101 et seq. Defendants reason, Wolverine sold them defective goods, the…”
DaimlerChrysler Corp. v. Wesco Distrib., Inc., 760 N.W.2d 828 (Mich. Ct. App. 2008). “Wesco bases much of its argument on an analysis of the parties’ exchange of documents under the Uniform Commercial Code-Sales (UCC), MCL 440.2101 et seq. However, the UCC does not apply in this case because the primary purpose of the contract was the provision of services,…”
First of Am. Bank v. Thompson, 552 N.W.2d 516 (Mich. Ct. App. 1996). “Defendant argues that plaintiffs suit to recover a repossession deficiency more than four years after the buyer’s default is barred under ucc Article 2-Sales, MCL 440.2101 et seq.) MSA 19.2101 et seq.”
Harnden v. Ford Motor Co., 408 F. Supp. 2d 309 (E.D. Mich. 2005). · cites it 2× “This issue is governed by Michigan’s Uniform Commercial Code for the sale of goods, Mich. Comp. Laws §§ 440.2101 , et seq. Under Michigan law, revocation of acceptance of a good is stated in Mich.”
McFadden v. Imus, 481 N.W.2d 812 (Mich. Ct. App. 1992). “The court ruled that the Uniform Commercial Code, MCL 440.2101 et seq.; MSA 19.2101 et seq.”
Rokicsak v. Colony Marine Sales & Serv., Inc., 219 F. Supp. 2d 810 (E.D. Mich. 2002). “§§ 440.2101 et seq.. Colony Marine argues that all warranties, both express and implied, were disclaimed under a January 22, 1998 written Purchase Agreement signed by plaintiff.”
Show all 34 citing cases →
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.