Michigan Compiled Laws

Mich. Comp. Laws § 440.9322 (2026)

Priorities among conflicting security interests in and agricultural liens on same collateral.

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MI-LEGlegislature.mi.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

UNIFORM COMMERCIAL CODE


Act 174 of 1962


440.9322 Priorities among conflicting security interests in and agricultural liens on same collateral.

Sec. 9322.

    (1) Except as otherwise provided in this section, priority among conflicting security interests and agricultural liens in the same collateral is determined according to the following rules:

    (a) Conflicting perfected security interests and agricultural liens rank according to priority in time of filing or perfection. Priority dates from the earlier of the time a filing covering the collateral is first made or the security interest or agricultural lien is first perfected, if there is no period thereafter when there is neither filing nor perfection.

    (b) A perfected security interest or agricultural lien has priority over a conflicting unperfected security interest or agricultural lien.

    (c) The first security interest or agricultural lien to attach or become effective has priority if conflicting security interests and agricultural liens are unperfected.

    (2) For the purposes of subsection (1)(a), both of the following apply:

    (a) The time of filing or perfection as to a security interest in collateral is also the time of filing or perfection as to a security interest in proceeds.

    (b) The time of filing of perfection as to a security interest in collateral supported by a supporting obligation is also the time of filing or perfection as to a security interest in the supporting obligation.

    (3) Except as otherwise provided in subsection (6), a security interest in collateral that qualifies for priority over a conflicting security interest under section 9327, 9328, 9329, 9330, or 9331 also has priority over a conflicting security interest in 1 or more of the following:

    (a) Any supporting obligation for the collateral.

    (b) Proceeds of the collateral if all of the following are met:

    (i) The security interest in proceeds is perfected.

    (ii) The proceeds are cash proceeds or of the same type as the collateral.

    (iii) In the case of proceeds that are proceeds of proceeds, all intervening proceeds are cash proceeds, proceeds of the same type as the collateral, or an account relating to the collateral.

    (4) Subject to subsection (5) and except as otherwise provided in subsection (6), if a security interest in chattel paper, deposit accounts, negotiable documents, instruments, investment property, or letter-of-credit rights is perfected by a method other than filing, conflicting perfected security interests in proceeds of the collateral rank according to priority in time of filing.

    (5) Subsection (4) applies only if the proceeds of the collateral are not cash proceeds, chattel paper, negotiable documents, instruments, investment property, or letter-of-credit rights.

    (6) Subsections (1) through (5) are subject to all of the following:

    (a) Subsection (7) and the other provisions of this part.

    (b) Section 4210 with respect to a security interest of a collecting bank.

    (c) Section 5118 with respect to a security interest of an issuer or nominated person.

    (d) Section 9110 with respect to a security interest arising under article 2 or 2A.

    (7) A perfected agricultural lien on collateral has priority over a conflicting security interest in or agricultural lien on the same collateral if the statute creating the agricultural lien so provides.

History: Add. 2000, Act 348, Eff. July 1, 2001

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 2008–2024 · leading case: Prime Fin. Servs. LLC v. Vinton, 761 N.W.2d 694 (Mich. Ct. App. 2008).
Prime Fin. Servs. LLC v. Vinton, 761 N.W.2d 694 (Mich. Ct. App. 2008). · cites it 2× “MCL 440.9322 (2001), comment 3 (“The rules may be regarded as adaptations of the idea, deeply rooted at common law, of a race of diligence among creditors.”
Swanson v. Trasino Park-Hudsons, LLC (In Re Vission, Inc.), 400 B.R. 215 (Bankr. E.D. Wis. 2008). “§ 9-322(a)(l); Mich. Comp. Laws § 440.9322 (l)(a); Wis. Stat.”
BMO Bank N.A. v. D H Trucking Inc. (E.D. Mich. 2024). · cites it 2× “Mich. Comp. Laws § 440.9322 (1)(a)-(b). Antecedent to this inquiry is whether Defendants have a conflicting security interest or lien in the Collateral.”
Dom. Unif. Rental v. Falcon Transp. Co (Mich. Ct. App. 2020). “9317(1); MCL 440.9322(1)(a). Appellant provided the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) filing of its perfected security interest in defendants’ accounts, and plaintiff does not dispute the validity of appellant’s security interest.”
Farmland Capital Solutions LLC v. Michigan Valley Irrigation Co (Mich. Ct. App. 2021). “MCL 440.9322(1)(a). However, an exception exists with regard to “purchase-money collateral,” which is comprised of “goods or software that secures a purchase- money obligation incurred with respect to the collateral.”
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 440.9322(1)(a) — 2 cases
Dom. Unif. Rental v. Falcon Transp. Co (Mich. Ct. App. 2020). “9317(1); MCL 440.9322(1)(a). Appellant provided the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) filing of its perfected security interest in defendants’ accounts, and plaintiff does not dispute the validity of appellant’s security interest.”
Farmland Capital Solutions LLC v. Michigan Valley Irrigation Co (Mich. Ct. App. 2021). “MCL 440.9322(1)(a). However, an exception exists with regard to “purchase-money collateral,” which is comprised of “goods or software that secures a purchase- money obligation incurred with respect to the collateral.”
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 440.9322(1)(b) — 1 case
Prime Fin. Servs. LLC v. Vinton, 761 N.W.2d 694 (Mich. Ct. App. 2008). “MCL 440.9322 (2001), comment 3 (“The rules may be regarded as adaptations of the idea, deeply rooted at common law, of a race of diligence among creditors.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.