Michigan Compiled Laws

Mich. Comp. Laws § 440.9324 (2026)

Priority of purchase-money security interests.

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MI-LEGlegislature.mi.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

UNIFORM COMMERCIAL CODE


Act 174 of 1962


440.9324 Priority of purchase-money security interests.

Sec. 9324.

    (1) Except as otherwise provided in subsection (7), a perfected purchase-money security interest in goods other than inventory or livestock has priority over a conflicting security interest in the same goods, and, except as otherwise provided in section 9327, a perfected security interest in its identifiable proceeds also has priority, if the purchase-money security interest is perfected when the debtor receives possession of the collateral or within 20 days thereafter.

    (2) Subject to subsection (3) and except as otherwise provided in subsection (7), a perfected purchase-money security interest in inventory has priority over a conflicting security interest in the same inventory, has priority over a conflicting security interest in chattel paper or an instrument constituting proceeds of the inventory and in proceeds of the chattel paper, if so provided in section 9330, and, except as otherwise provided in section 9327, also has priority in identifiable cash proceeds of the inventory to the extent the identifiable cash proceeds are received on or before the delivery of the inventory to a buyer, if all of the following are met:

    (a) The purchase-money security interest is perfected when the debtor receives possession of the inventory.

    (b) The purchase-money secured party sends an authenticated notification to the holder of the conflicting security interest.

    (c) The holder of the conflicting security interest receives the notification within 5 years before the debtor receives possession of the inventory.

    (d) The notification states that the person sending the notification has or expects to acquire a purchase-money security interest in inventory of the debtor and describes the inventory.

    (3) Subsection (2)(b) through (d) apply only if the holder of the conflicting security interest had filed a financing statement covering the same types of inventory before 1 of the following:

    (a) If the purchase-money security interest is perfected by filing, before the date of the filing.

    (b) If the purchase-money security interest is temporarily perfected without filing or possession under section 9312(6), before the beginning of the 20-day period thereunder.

    (4) Subject to subsection (5) and except as otherwise provided in subsection (7), a perfected purchase-money security interest in livestock that are farm products has priority over a conflicting security interest in the same livestock, and, except as otherwise provided in section 9327, a perfected security interest in their identifiable proceeds and identifiable products in their unmanufactured states also has priority, if all of the following are met:

    (a) The purchase-money security interest is perfected when the debtor receives possession of the livestock.

    (b) The purchase-money secured party sends an authenticated notification to the holder of the conflicting security interest.

    (c) The holder of the conflicting security interest receives the notification within 6 months before the debtor receives possession of the livestock.

    (d) The notification states that the person sending the notification has or expects to acquire a purchase-money security interest in livestock of the debtor and describes the livestock.

    (5) Subsection (4)(b) through (d) apply only if the holder of the conflicting security interest had filed a financing statement covering the same types of livestock before 1 of the following:

    (a) If the purchase-money security interest is perfected by filing, before the date of the filing.

    (b) If the purchase-money security interest is temporarily perfected without filing or possession under section 9312(6), before the beginning of the 20-day period thereunder.

    (6) Except as otherwise provided in subsection (7), a perfected purchase-money security interest in software has priority over a conflicting security interest in the same collateral, and, except as otherwise provided in section 9327, a perfected security interest in its identifiable proceeds also has priority, to the extent that the purchase-money security interest in the goods in which the software was acquired for use has priority in the goods and proceeds of the goods under this section.

    (7) If more than 1 security interest qualifies for priority in the same collateral under subsection (1), (2), (4), or (6), 1 of the following applies:

    (a) A security interest securing an obligation incurred as all or part of the price of the collateral has priority over a security interest securing an obligation incurred for value given to enable the debtor to acquire rights in or the use of collateral.

    (b) In all other cases, section 9322(1) applies to the qualifying security interest.

History: Add. 2000, Act 348, Eff. July 1, 2001

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 2012–2021 · leading case: Arthur Glick Truck Sales, Inc. v. Stuphen East Corp., 914 F. Supp. 2d 529 (S.D.N.Y. 2012).
Arthur Glick Truck Sales, Inc. v. Stuphen East Corp., 914 F. Supp. 2d 529 (S.D.N.Y. 2012). “See Mich. Comp. Laws Ann. § 440.9324 ; N.Y. U.”
Farmland Capital Solutions LLC v. Michigan Valley Irrigation Co (Mich. Ct. App. 2021). · cites it 10× “On the other hand, defendant argues, and the trial court found, that the 20-day perfection period does not begin to run until the goods in question actually become “collateral” subject to a security interest.”
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 440.9324(1) — 1 case
Farmland Capital Solutions LLC v. Michigan Valley Irrigation Co (Mich. Ct. App. 2021). “On the other hand, defendant argues, and the trial court found, that the 20-day perfection period does not begin to run until the goods in question actually become “collateral” subject to a security interest.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.