Michigan Compiled Laws

Mich. Comp. Laws § 440.9407 (2026)

Restrictions on creation or enforcement of security interest in leasehold interest or in lessor's residual interest.

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MI-LEGlegislature.mi.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

UNIFORM COMMERCIAL CODE


Act 174 of 1962


440.9407 Restrictions on creation or enforcement of security interest in leasehold interest or in lessor's residual interest.

Sec. 9407.

    (1) Except as otherwise provided in subsection (2), a term in a lease agreement is ineffective to the extent that it does 1 or more of the following:

    (a) Prohibits, restricts, or requires the consent of a party to the lease to the assignment or transfer of, or the creation, attachment, perfection, or enforcement of a security interest in, an interest of a party under the lease contract or in the lessor's residual interest in the goods.

    (b) Provides that the assignment or transfer or the creation, attachment, perfection, or enforcement of the security interest may give rise to a default, breach, right of recoupment, claim, defense, termination, right of termination, or remedy under the lease.

    (2) Except as otherwise provided in section 2A303(7), a term described in subsection (1)(b) is effective to the extent that there is 1 or more of the following:

    (a) A transfer by the lessee of the lessee's right of possession or use of the goods in violation of the term.

    (b) A delegation of a material performance of either party to the lease contract in violation of the term.

    (3) The creation, attachment, perfection, or enforcement of a security interest in the lessor's interest under the lease contract or the lessor's residual interest in the goods is not a transfer that materially impairs the lessee's prospect of obtaining return performance or materially changes the duty of or materially increases the burden or risk imposed on the lessee within the purview of section 2A303(4) unless, and then only to the extent that, enforcement actually results in a delegation of material performance of the lessor.

History: 1962, Act 174, Eff. Jan. 1, 1964 ;-- Am. 1976, Act 27, Imd. Eff. Mar. 4, 1976 ;-- Am. 1978, Act 369, Eff. Jan. 1, 1979 ;-- Am. 1988, Act 130, Eff. Sept. 1, 1988 ;-- Am. 2000, Act 348, Eff. July 1, 2001

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 1974–1989 · leading case: Borg-Warner Acceptance Corp. v. Dep't of State, 444 N.W.2d 786 (Mich. 1989).
Borg-Warner Acceptance Corp. v. Dep't of State, 444 N.W.2d 786 (Mich. 1989). · cites it 2× “This case of first impression presents the question whether a prospective creditor, who requests the Secretary of State to perform a filing search pursuant to MCL 440.9407; MSA 19.9407 (UCC 9-407) for effective financing statements naming a particular debtor, may recover damages…”
Cont'l Oil Co. v. Citizens Trust & Sav. Bank, 225 N.W.2d 209 (Mich. Ct. App. 1974). “MCLA 440.9407(2); MSA 19.9407(2). Thus, it is quite evident that the debtor’s name is an important item in the financing statement and in the filing system.”
Borg-Warner Acceptance Corp. v. Dep't of State, 426 N.W.2d 717 (Mich. Ct. App. 1988). “MCL 440.9407; MSA 19.9407 provides: (1) If the person filing a financing statement, termination statement, statement of assignment, or statement of release, furnishes the filing officer a copy thereof, the filing officer shall upon request note upon the copy the file number and…”
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 440.9407(2) — 1 case
Cont'l Oil Co. v. Citizens Trust & Sav. Bank, 225 N.W.2d 209 (Mich. Ct. App. 1974). “MCLA 440.9407(2); MSA 19.9407(2). Thus, it is quite evident that the debtor’s name is an important item in the financing statement and in the filing system.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.