Michigan Compiled Laws

Mich. Comp. Laws § 440.9625 (2026)

Remedies for secured party's failure to comply with article.

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MI-LEGlegislature.mi.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

UNIFORM COMMERCIAL CODE


Act 174 of 1962


440.9625 Remedies for secured party's failure to comply with article.

Sec. 9625.

    (1) If it is established that a secured party is not proceeding in accordance with this article, a court may order or restrain collection, enforcement, or disposition of collateral on appropriate terms and conditions.

    (2) Subject to subsections (3), (4), and (6), a person is liable for damages in the amount of any loss caused by a failure to comply with this article. Loss caused by a failure to comply may include loss resulting from the debtor's inability to obtain, or increased costs of, alternative financing.

    (3) Except as otherwise provided in section 9628, both of the following apply:

    (a) A person that, at the time of the failure, was a debtor, was an obligor, or held a security interest in or other lien on the collateral may recover damages under subsection (2) for its loss.

    (b) If the collateral is consumer goods, a person that was a debtor or a secondary obligor at the time a secured party failed to comply with this part may recover for that failure in any event an amount not less than the credit service charge paid plus 10% of the principal amount of the obligation or the time-price differential paid plus 10% of the cash price.

    (4) A debtor whose deficiency is eliminated under section 9626 may recover damages for the loss of any surplus. However, a debtor or secondary obligor whose deficiency is eliminated or reduced under section 9626 may not otherwise recover under subsection (2) for noncompliance with the provisions of this part relating to collection, enforcement, disposition, or acceptance. Regardless of whether the debtor's or secondary obligor's deficiency is eliminated or reduced under section 9626 or other applicable law, any damages recovered by the debtor or secondary obligor under subsection (3) shall be reduced by the amount that the sum of the secured obligation, expenses, and attorney's fees exceeds the proceeds of collection, enforcement, disposition, or acceptance.

    (5) In addition to any damages recoverable under subsection (2), the debtor, consumer obligor, or person named as a debtor in a filed record, as applicable, may recover $500.00 in each case from a person that does 1 or more of the following:

    (a) Fails to comply with section 9208.

    (b) Fails to comply with section 9209.

    (c) Files a record that the person is not entitled to file under section 9509(1).

    (d) Fails to cause the secured party of record to file or send a termination statement as required by section 9513(1) or (3).

    (e) Fails to comply with section 9616(2)(a) and whose failure is part of a pattern, or consistent with a practice, of noncompliance.

    (f) Fails to comply with section 9616(2)(b).

    (6) A debtor or consumer obligor may recover damages under subsection (2) and, in addition, $500.00 in each case from a person that, without reasonable cause, fails to comply with a request under section 9210. A recipient of a request under section 9210 that never claimed an interest in the collateral or obligations that are the subject of a request under that section has a reasonable excuse for failure to comply with the request within the meaning of this subsection.

    (7) If a secured party fails to comply with a request regarding a list of collateral or a statement of account under section 9210, the secured party may claim a security interest only as shown in the list or statement included in the request as against a person that is reasonably misled by the failure.

History: Add. 2000, Act 348, Eff. July 1, 2001 ;-- Am. 2014, Act 104, Imd. Eff. Apr. 10, 2014

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 2003–2026 · leading case: In Re Sanders, 291 B.R. 97 (Bankr. E.D. Mich. 2003).
In Re Sanders, 291 B.R. 97 (Bankr. E.D. Mich. 2003). “§ 440.9625 provides that if the creditor does not proceed “in accordance with [Article 9],” the creditor is liable to the debtor for damages.”
Hensley v. Gassman, 763 F. Supp. 2d 876 (E.D. Mich. 2011). · cites it 2× “§ 440.9625(2), (3). If the collateral is a consumer good, the debtor may recover an amount not less than the credit service charge plus 10% of the principal amount of the obligation or the time-price differential plus 10% of the cash price.”
Gallatin Manor, LLC v. PNC Bank, N.A. (E.D. Mich. 2020). · cites it 5× “Here, Gallatin II alleges that PNC violated MCL § 440.9625. MCL § 440.9625 provides that “failure to comply with [Article 9]” may result in damages.”
Agri-Sci. Tech. LLC v. Greiner's Green Acres Inc (Mich. Ct. App. 2016). “MCL 440.9625(2) and (3)(a). First, Agri-Science argues that issues of fact exist regarding the disposition of the cherry picker and other collateral.”
Pathward, NA v. Inlet Trucking, LLC, & Reginald Krug (E.D. Mich. 2026). “at § 440.9625 (detailing remedies for a secured party’s failure to comply with Article 9, suggesting a court retains jurisdiction even in the absence of Article 9 compliance).”
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 440.9625(2) — 2 cases
Hensley v. Gassman, 763 F. Supp. 2d 876 (E.D. Mich. 2011). “§ 440.9625(2), (3). If the collateral is a consumer good, the debtor may recover an amount not less than the credit service charge plus 10% of the principal amount of the obligation or the time-price differential plus 10% of the cash price.”
Agri-Sci. Tech. LLC v. Greiner's Green Acres Inc (Mich. Ct. App. 2016). “MCL 440.9625(2) and (3)(a). First, Agri-Science argues that issues of fact exist regarding the disposition of the cherry picker and other collateral.”
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 440.9625(3)(b) — 1 case
Hensley v. Gassman, 763 F. Supp. 2d 876 (E.D. Mich. 2011). “§ 440.9625(2), (3). If the collateral is a consumer good, the debtor may recover an amount not less than the credit service charge plus 10% of the principal amount of the obligation or the time-price differential plus 10% of the cash price.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.