Mich. Comp. Laws » Michigan Compiled Laws / Chapter 45 / Act 237 of 1919
Michigan Compiled Laws

Mich. Comp. Laws § 45.402 (2026)

County officers; statement of fees collected, disposition, receipts.

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MI-LEGlegislature.mi.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

SALARIES IN LIEU OF FEES


Act 237 of 1919


45.402 County officers; statement of fees collected, disposition, receipts.

Sec. 2.

    The sheriff, under-sheriff and deputy sheriffs and the county clerks, county treasurers and registers of deeds and their deputies who receive a salary shall collect and make itemized statements of all fees required by law for the service of any process other than that of the county, and of all other fees collected by them which said fees shall be paid by them when collected to the county treasurer, on or before the last day of each month taking duplicate receipts therefor.

History: 1919, Act 237, Eff. Aug. 14, 1919 ;-- Am. 1921, Act 193, Eff. Aug. 18, 1921 ;-- CL 1929, 1347 ;-- CL 1948, 45.402

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 1957–1987 · leading case: Isaman v. Antrim Cnty. Supervisors, 81 N.W.2d 426 (Mich. 1957).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Isaman v. Antrim Cnty. Supervisors, 81 N.W.2d 426 (Mich. 1957). “Reliance is also placed on CL 1948, § 45.402 (Stat Ann § 5.912), requiring county officers receiving a salary to report and pay all fees collected by them to the county treasurer.”
Ottawa Cnty. Clerk v. Ottawa Cnty. Bd. of Commissioners, 407 N.W.2d 384 (Mich. 1987). · cites it 2× “5 1919 PA 237 , MCL 45.402, 45.403; MSA 5.912, 5.913. 6 1921 PA 193 , MCL 45.”
Ottawa Cnty. Clerk v. Ottawa Cnty. Bd. of Commissioners, 378 N.W.2d 527 (Mich. Ct. App. 1985). “913 provides that the salaries of the county sheriff, undersheriff, county clerk, *513 county treasurer and register of deeds and their deputies "shall be paid monthly by the county treasurer, upon a warrant issued by the county clerk, but not until an itemized statement of all…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.