Michigan Compiled Laws
Mich. Comp. Laws § 450.1493 (2026)
Repealed. 1989, Act 121, Eff. Oct. 1, 1989.
✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
MI-LEGlegislature.mi.gov
JustiaChapter on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
BUSINESS CORPORATION ACT
Act 284 of 1972
450.1493 Repealed. 1989, Act 121, Eff. Oct. 1, 1989.
Repealed. 1989, Act 121, Eff. Oct. 1, 1989.
Compiler's Notes:
The repealed section pertained to expenses of derivative action.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4
cases, 1978–2017 · leading case: Barnett v. Int'l Tennis Corp., 263 N.W.2d 908 (Mich. Ct. App. 1978).
Barnett v. Int'l Tennis Corp., 263 N.W.2d 908 (Mich. Ct. App. 1978). “See MCLA 450.1493; MSA 21.200(493). Another issue raised by defendants is whether or not the trial court abused its discretion in denying defendants’ motion to tax their costs against plaintiff more than the ordinary witness fee for defendants’ expert witness.”
Moore v. Carney, 269 N.W.2d 614 (Mich. Ct. App. 1978). “Under the statute, MCL 450.1493(1); MSA 21.200(493)(1), attorney fees may be awarded if an action "brought in the right of the corporation is successful” and the corporation is thus benefited by the suit.”
Virginia M. Damon Trust v. North Country Fin. Corp., 325 F. Supp. 2d 817 (W.D. Mich. 2004). “§ 450.1493(a) thus began to run on September 17, 2003, and expired on December 16, 2003.”
Willner v. Syntel, Inc., 256 F. Supp. 3d 684 (E.D. Mich. 2017). “, Mich. Comp. Laws § 450.1493 , but the statutes do not authorize an award of attorney fees for a benefit that results from a demand letter.”
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 450.1493(1) — 1 case
Moore v. Carney, 269 N.W.2d 614 (Mich. Ct. App. 1978). “Under the statute, MCL 450.1493(1); MSA 21.200(493)(1), attorney fees may be awarded if an action "brought in the right of the corporation is successful” and the corporation is thus benefited by the suit.”
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 450.1493(a) — 1 case
Virginia M. Damon Trust v. North Country Fin. Corp., 325 F. Supp. 2d 817 (W.D. Mich. 2004). “§ 450.1493(a) thus began to run on September 17, 2003, and expired on December 16, 2003.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.