Michigan Compiled Laws

Mich. Comp. Laws § 450.1841a (2026)

Notice to existing claimants of dissolution; contents; notice as recognition of validity of claim; conditions barring claim; “existing claim” defined; effective date of notice.

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MI-LEGlegislature.mi.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

BUSINESS CORPORATION ACT


Act 284 of 1972


450.1841a Notice to existing claimants of dissolution; contents; notice as recognition of validity of claim; conditions barring claim; “existing claim” defined; effective date of notice.

Sec. 841a.

    (1) The dissolved corporation may notify its existing claimants in writing of the dissolution at any time after the effective date of the dissolution. The written notice shall include all of the following:

    (a) A description of the information that must be included in a claim. The corporation may demand sufficient information to permit it to make a reasonable judgment whether the claim should be accepted or rejected.

    (b) A mailing address where a claim may be sent.

    (c) The deadline, which may not be less than 6 months from the effective date of the written notice, by which the dissolved corporation must receive the claim.

    (d) A statement that the claim will be barred if not received by the deadline.

    (2) The giving of notice described above does not constitute recognition that a person to whom the notice is directed has a valid claim against the corporation.

    (3) A claim against the dissolved corporation is barred if either of the following applies:

    (a) If a claimant who was given written notice under subsection (1) does not deliver the claim to the dissolved corporation by the deadline.

    (b) If a claimant whose claim was rejected by a written notice of rejection by the dissolved corporation does not commence a proceeding to enforce the claim within 90 days from the effective date of the written notice of rejection.

    (4) For purposes of this section and section 842a, "existing claim" means any claim or right against the corporation, liquidated or unliquidated. It does not mean a contingent liability or a claim based on an event occurring after the effective date of dissolution.

    (5) For purposes of this section, the effective date of the written notice is the earliest of the following:

    (a) The date it is received.

    (b) Five days after its deposit in the United States mail, as evidenced by the postmark, if it is mailed postpaid and correctly addressed.

    (c) The date shown on the return receipt, if the notice is sent by registered or certified mail, return receipt requested, and the receipt is signed by or on behalf of the addressee.

History: Add. 1989, Act 121, Eff. Oct. 1, 1989 ;-- Am. 1993, Act 91, Eff. Oct. 1, 1993

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1998–2024 · leading case: Gilliam v. Hi-Temp Prods. Inc., 677 N.W.2d 856 (Mich. Ct. App. 2004).
Gilliam v. Hi-Temp Prods. Inc., 677 N.W.2d 856 (Mich. Ct. App. 2004). · cites it 2× “, 1999) (applying the six-month period of MCL 450.1841a for filing claims against a dissolved Michigan corporation to bar a Missouri worker's compensation claim).”
Freeman v. Hi Temp Prods., 580 N.W.2d 918 (Mich. Ct. App. 1998). · cites it 3× “§ 450.1841a; M.S.A. § 21.200(841a). Additionally, during that same time frame, Hi Temp published a notice in the Oakland Press, a paper published in the county in which Hi Temp's principal office was located, in the form and containing the information required by § 842a of the…”
Gilliam v. Hi-Temp Prods., Inc., 677 N.W.2d 856 (Mich. Ct. App. 2003). · cites it 2× “” Missouri ex rel Nat’l Super Markets, Inc v Dowd, 1 SW3d 595, 598 (Mo App, 1999) (applying the six-month period of MCL 450.1841a for filing claims against a dissolved Michigan corporation to bar a Missouri worker’s compensation claim).”
Freeman v. HI Temp Prods., Inc., 229 Mich. App. 92 (Mich. Ct. App. 1998). · cites it 3× “In the intervening eleven-day period between the receipt by the bureau of the certificate and its filing, Hi Temp sent notice to known creditors, including the claimants in these cases, by addressing a letter to the law firm that, at that time, was representing most or all of…”
Jonathon Drake v. Plum Hollow Lanes Inc (Mich. Ct. App. 2024). · cites it 8× “However, we are not persuaded that defendants had effectively wound up their affairs in January 2020, given their choice not to take advantage of the provisions of MCL 450.1841a or MCL 450.1842a, and the existence of plaintiff’s claim.”
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 450.1841a(1)(c) — 1 case
Jonathon Drake v. Plum Hollow Lanes Inc (Mich. Ct. App. 2024). “However, we are not persuaded that defendants had effectively wound up their affairs in January 2020, given their choice not to take advantage of the provisions of MCL 450.1841a or MCL 450.1842a, and the existence of plaintiff’s claim.”
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 450.1841a(4) — 2 cases
Gilliam v. Hi-Temp Prods. Inc., 677 N.W.2d 856 (Mich. Ct. App. 2004). “, 1999) (applying the six-month period of MCL 450.1841a for filing claims against a dissolved Michigan corporation to bar a Missouri worker's compensation claim).”
Gilliam v. Hi-Temp Prods., Inc., 677 N.W.2d 856 (Mich. Ct. App. 2003). “” Missouri ex rel Nat’l Super Markets, Inc v Dowd, 1 SW3d 595, 598 (Mo App, 1999) (applying the six-month period of MCL 450.1841a for filing claims against a dissolved Michigan corporation to bar a Missouri worker’s compensation claim).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.