Mich. Comp. Laws » Michigan Compiled Laws / Chapter 46 / Act 261 of 1965
Michigan Compiled Laws

Mich. Comp. Laws § 46.358 (2026)

County and regional commissions; acquisition of property.

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MI-LEGlegislature.mi.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

COUNTY AND REGIONAL PARKS


Act 261 of 1965


46.358 County and regional commissions; acquisition of property.

Sec. 8.

    A county commission may acquire in the name of the county and a regional commission may acquire in its name by gift, purchase, lease, agreement, or otherwise, in fee or with conditions, suitable real property, within the county or region, or contiguous with or adjacent thereto, for public parks, preserves, parkways, playgrounds, recreation centers, wildlife areas, lands reserved for flood conditions for impounding runoff water, and other conservation purposes. In acquiring or accepting land, due consideration shall be given to its scenic, historic, archaeologic, recreational or other special features.

History: 1965, Act 261, Imd. Eff. July 21, 1965

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 1989–2014 · leading case: Rental Props. Owners Ass'n v. Kent Cnty. Treasurer, 308 Mich. App. 498 (Mich. Ct. App. 2014).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Rental Props. Owners Ass'n v. Kent Cnty. Treasurer, 308 Mich. App. 498 (Mich. Ct. App. 2014). · cites it 2× “11 and MCL 46.358 to argue that Kent County exceeded its authority when it sold the tax-foreclosed properties to the KCLBA.”
Richardson v. Jackson Cnty., 443 N.W.2d 105 (Mich. 1989). · cites it 2× “For other provisions expressly or impliedly granting authority to counties and townships to operate public parks and bathing beaches, see MCL 46.358; MSA 5.570(108) (county parks commission may acquire real property for public parks, playgrounds and recreational centers); MCL 46.”
in Re Petition of Kent Cnty. Land Bank Auth. (Mich. Ct. App. 2014). · cites it 2× “11 and MCL 46.358 to argue that Kent County exceeded its authority when it sold the tax-foreclosed properties to KCLBA.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.